Skip to Content
Main content

LEADERSHIP PREP OCEAN HILL CS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

336
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 508

LEVEL 1

29

6%

LEVEL 2

143

28%

LEVEL 3

211

42%

LEVEL 4

125

25%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

327
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 511

LEVEL 1

46

9%

LEVEL 2

138

27%

LEVEL 3

214

42%

LEVEL 4

113

22%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

186
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

60

24%

LEVEL 3

115

45%

LEVEL 4

71

28%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

192
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

12

5%

LEVEL 2

58

22%

LEVEL 3

121

46%

LEVEL 4

71

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

150
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

22

9%

LEVEL 2

83

33%

LEVEL 3

96

38%

LEVEL 4

54

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

135
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

34

14%

LEVEL 2

80

32%

LEVEL 3

93

37%

LEVEL 4

42

17%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

3

30%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

281
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 426

LEVEL 1

24

6%

LEVEL 2

121

28%

LEVEL 3

174

41%

LEVEL 4

107

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

273
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 416

LEVEL 1

33

8%

LEVEL 2

110

26%

LEVEL 3

184

44%

LEVEL 4

89

21%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

42
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

4

6%

LEVEL 2

17

27%

LEVEL 3

29

46%

LEVEL 4

13

21%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

44
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

8

11%

LEVEL 2

21

29%

LEVEL 3

24

33%

LEVEL 4

20

27%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

319
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 447

LEVEL 1

15

3%

LEVEL 2

113

25%

LEVEL 3

199

45%

LEVEL 4

120

27%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

315
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 461

LEVEL 1

29

6%

LEVEL 2

117

25%

LEVEL 3

206

45%

LEVEL 4

109

24%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

17
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

14

23%

LEVEL 2

30

49%

LEVEL 3

12

20%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

17

34%

LEVEL 2

21

42%

LEVEL 3

8

16%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

335
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 503

LEVEL 1

27

5%

LEVEL 2

141

28%

LEVEL 3

210

42%

LEVEL 4

125

25%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

326
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 502

LEVEL 1

43

9%

LEVEL 2

133

26%

LEVEL 3

213

42%

LEVEL 4

113

23%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

13

21%

LEVEL 3

33

52%

LEVEL 4

15

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

5

6%

LEVEL 2

17

20%

LEVEL 3

33

39%

LEVEL 4

29

35%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

288
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 445

LEVEL 1

27

6%

LEVEL 2

130

29%

LEVEL 3

178

40%

LEVEL 4

110

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

265
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 427

LEVEL 1

41

10%

LEVEL 2

121

28%

LEVEL 3

181

42%

LEVEL 4

84

20%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

310
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 461

LEVEL 1

28

6%

LEVEL 2

123

27%

LEVEL 3

189

41%

LEVEL 4

121

26%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

26
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

20

43%

LEVEL 3

22

47%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.