Skip to Content
Main content

EXCELLENCE GIRLS CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

376
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 525

LEVEL 1

26

5%

LEVEL 2

123

23%

LEVEL 3

229

44%

LEVEL 4

147

28%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

320
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 469

LEVEL 1

47

10%

LEVEL 2

102

22%

LEVEL 3

210

45%

LEVEL 4

110

23%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MALE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MALE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

8
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

1

9%

LEVEL 3

7

64%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

8
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

5

42%

LEVEL 4

3

25%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

14
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

7

50%

LEVEL 4

7

50%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

14
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

2

11%

LEVEL 3

5

28%

LEVEL 4

9

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

311
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 443

LEVEL 1

21

5%

LEVEL 2

111

25%

LEVEL 3

192

43%

LEVEL 4

119

27%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

259
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

36

9%

LEVEL 2

84

22%

LEVEL 3

175

46%

LEVEL 4

84

22%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

35
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

3

7%

LEVEL 2

8

17%

LEVEL 3

18

39%

LEVEL 4

17

37%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

32
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

6

12%

LEVEL 2

13

25%

LEVEL 3

19

37%

LEVEL 4

13

25%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

352
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 469

LEVEL 1

16

3%

LEVEL 2

101

22%

LEVEL 3

210

45%

LEVEL 4

142

30%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

305
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 415

LEVEL 1

26

6%

LEVEL 2

84

20%

LEVEL 3

198

48%

LEVEL 4

107

26%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

24
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

10

18%

LEVEL 2

22

39%

LEVEL 3

19

34%

LEVEL 4

5

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

21

39%

LEVEL 2

18

33%

LEVEL 3

12

22%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

374
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 519

LEVEL 1

25

5%

LEVEL 2

120

23%

LEVEL 3

228

44%

LEVEL 4

146

28%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

316
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 457

LEVEL 1

43

9%

LEVEL 2

98

21%

LEVEL 3

206

45%

LEVEL 4

110

24%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

5

5%

LEVEL 2

22

24%

LEVEL 3

35

38%

LEVEL 4

31

33%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

75
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

9

10%

LEVEL 3

49

56%

LEVEL 4

26

30%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

310
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 432

LEVEL 1

21

5%

LEVEL 2

101

23%

LEVEL 3

194

45%

LEVEL 4

116

27%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

245
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 382

LEVEL 1

44

12%

LEVEL 2

93

24%

LEVEL 3

161

42%

LEVEL 4

84

22%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

344
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 482

LEVEL 1

24

5%

LEVEL 2

114

24%

LEVEL 3

206

43%

LEVEL 4

138

29%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

32
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

9

21%

LEVEL 3

23

53%

LEVEL 4

9

21%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.