JOHN W LAVELLE PREP CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

142
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 474

LEVEL 1

129

27%

LEVEL 2

203

43%

LEVEL 3

105

22%

LEVEL 4

37

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

130
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 490

LEVEL 1

167

34%

LEVEL 2

193

39%

LEVEL 3

96

20%

LEVEL 4

34

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

85
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

47

20%

LEVEL 2

101

43%

LEVEL 3

55

24%

LEVEL 4

30

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

67
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

67

29%

LEVEL 2

99

42%

LEVEL 3

48

21%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

57
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

82

34%

LEVEL 2

102

42%

LEVEL 3

50

21%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

63
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

100

39%

LEVEL 2

94

37%

LEVEL 3

48

19%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

6

55%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

6

67%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

11
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

15

38%

LEVEL 2

14

35%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

7

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

13
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

10

30%

LEVEL 2

10

30%

LEVEL 3

8

24%

LEVEL 4

5

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

70
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

59

27%

LEVEL 2

91

41%

LEVEL 3

54

25%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

63
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

74

33%

LEVEL 2

86

39%

LEVEL 3

49

22%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

52
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

51

26%

LEVEL 2

91

47%

LEVEL 3

44

23%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

44
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

81

38%

LEVEL 2

89

42%

LEVEL 3

35

16%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

127
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

44

14%

LEVEL 2

134

44%

LEVEL 3

91

30%

LEVEL 4

36

12%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

118
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

62

20%

LEVEL 2

128

42%

LEVEL 3

85

28%

LEVEL 4

33

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

85

50%

LEVEL 2

69

41%

LEVEL 3

14

8%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

105

58%

LEVEL 2

65

36%

LEVEL 3

11

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

141
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 462

LEVEL 1

122

26%

LEVEL 2

199

43%

LEVEL 3

104

23%

LEVEL 4

37

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

128
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 478

LEVEL 1

159

33%

LEVEL 2

191

40%

LEVEL 3

95

20%

LEVEL 4

33

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

7

58%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

8

67%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

27

28%

LEVEL 2

33

34%

LEVEL 3

27

28%

LEVEL 4

11

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

33

31%

LEVEL 2

37

35%

LEVEL 3

28

26%

LEVEL 4

9

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

104
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

102

27%

LEVEL 2

170

45%

LEVEL 3

78

21%

LEVEL 4

26

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

93
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

134

35%

LEVEL 2

156

41%

LEVEL 3

68

18%

LEVEL 4

25

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

138
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 455

LEVEL 1

121

27%

LEVEL 2

196

43%

LEVEL 3

101

22%

LEVEL 4

37

8%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

8

42%

LEVEL 2

7

37%

LEVEL 3

4

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.