Skip to Content
Main content

QUEST TO LEARN GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

79
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

37

21%

LEVEL 2

63

35%

LEVEL 3

50

28%

LEVEL 4

29

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

62
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

30

22%

LEVEL 2

45

33%

LEVEL 3

42

31%

LEVEL 4

20

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

32
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

15

20%

LEVEL 2

29

38%

LEVEL 3

24

32%

LEVEL 4

8

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

30
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

9

15%

LEVEL 2

21

35%

LEVEL 3

19

32%

LEVEL 4

11

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

47
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

22

21%

LEVEL 2

34

33%

LEVEL 3

26

25%

LEVEL 4

21

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

32
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

21

27%

LEVEL 2

24

31%

LEVEL 3

23

30%

LEVEL 4

9

12%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

19
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

2

7%

LEVEL 2

8

28%

LEVEL 3

11

38%

LEVEL 4

8

28%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

15
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

4

16%

LEVEL 2

6

24%

LEVEL 3

13

52%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

23
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

4

13%

LEVEL 2

5

16%

LEVEL 3

9

28%

LEVEL 4

14

44%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

12

32%

LEVEL 2

15

41%

LEVEL 3

7

19%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

11

32%

LEVEL 2

14

41%

LEVEL 3

6

18%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

21
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

18

25%

LEVEL 2

32

45%

LEVEL 3

19

27%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

13

23%

LEVEL 2

21

38%

LEVEL 3

17

30%

LEVEL 4

5

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

60
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

22

17%

LEVEL 2

50

38%

LEVEL 3

39

30%

LEVEL 4

21

16%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

54
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

18

17%

LEVEL 2

36

33%

LEVEL 3

35

32%

LEVEL 4

19

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

19
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

15

32%

LEVEL 2

13

28%

LEVEL 3

11

23%

LEVEL 4

8

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

12

41%

LEVEL 2

9

31%

LEVEL 3

7

24%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

61
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

26

20%

LEVEL 2

44

34%

LEVEL 3

41

31%

LEVEL 4

20

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

4

9%

LEVEL 2

8

17%

LEVEL 3

17

36%

LEVEL 4

18

38%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

4

11%

LEVEL 2

8

23%

LEVEL 3

12

34%

LEVEL 4

11

31%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

33

25%

LEVEL 2

55

42%

LEVEL 3

33

25%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

26

25%

LEVEL 2

37

36%

LEVEL 3

30

29%

LEVEL 4

9

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

74
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

30

18%

LEVEL 2

59

36%

LEVEL 3

46

28%

LEVEL 4

28

17%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

53
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

22

19%

LEVEL 2

41

35%

LEVEL 3

36

31%

LEVEL 4

17

15%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

7

44%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

8

38%

LEVEL 2

4

19%

LEVEL 3

6

29%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.