WEST PREP ACADEMY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

80
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

24

14%

LEVEL 2

65

38%

LEVEL 3

58

34%

LEVEL 4

22

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

69
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

40

23%

LEVEL 2

67

38%

LEVEL 3

49

28%

LEVEL 4

20

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

46
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

9

11%

LEVEL 2

26

32%

LEVEL 3

33

41%

LEVEL 4

13

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

39
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

13

15%

LEVEL 2

32

38%

LEVEL 3

27

32%

LEVEL 4

12

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

34
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

15

17%

LEVEL 2

39

44%

LEVEL 3

25

28%

LEVEL 4

9

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

30
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

27

29%

LEVEL 2

35

38%

LEVEL 3

22

24%

LEVEL 4

8

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

53
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

11

11%

LEVEL 2

37

37%

LEVEL 3

35

35%

LEVEL 4

18

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

39
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

14

16%

LEVEL 2

36

40%

LEVEL 3

28

31%

LEVEL 4

11

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

23
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

13

21%

LEVEL 2

27

43%

LEVEL 3

21

33%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

26
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

25

31%

LEVEL 2

30

37%

LEVEL 3

18

22%

LEVEL 4

8

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

70
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

10

8%

LEVEL 2

45

36%

LEVEL 3

52

42%

LEVEL 4

18

14%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

60
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

19

15%

LEVEL 2

50

39%

LEVEL 3

42

33%

LEVEL 4

18

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

14

32%

LEVEL 2

20

45%

LEVEL 3

6

14%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

21

45%

LEVEL 2

17

36%

LEVEL 3

7

15%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

80
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

21

13%

LEVEL 2

62

38%

LEVEL 3

58

36%

LEVEL 4

22

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

69
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

35

21%

LEVEL 2

63

38%

LEVEL 3

49

29%

LEVEL 4

20

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

4

17%

LEVEL 2

6

25%

LEVEL 3

9

38%

LEVEL 4

5

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

3

12%

LEVEL 2

9

35%

LEVEL 3

11

42%

LEVEL 4

3

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

20

14%

LEVEL 2

59

41%

LEVEL 3

49

34%

LEVEL 4

17

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

37

25%

LEVEL 2

58

39%

LEVEL 3

38

25%

LEVEL 4

17

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

70
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

18

13%

LEVEL 2

56

39%

LEVEL 3

51

35%

LEVEL 4

19

13%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

60
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

31

21%

LEVEL 2

56

38%

LEVEL 3

43

29%

LEVEL 4

17

12%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

6

24%

LEVEL 2

9

36%

LEVEL 3

7

28%

LEVEL 4

3

12%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

9

31%

LEVEL 2

11

38%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.