Skip to Content
Main content

SCIENCE & MEDICINE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

116
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

103

27%

LEVEL 2

158

42%

LEVEL 3

79

21%

LEVEL 4

37

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

138
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

113

30%

LEVEL 2

123

33%

LEVEL 3

92

25%

LEVEL 4

46

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

79
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

31

17%

LEVEL 2

77

41%

LEVEL 3

53

28%

LEVEL 4

26

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

80
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

43

25%

LEVEL 2

49

28%

LEVEL 3

49

28%

LEVEL 4

31

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

72

38%

LEVEL 2

81

43%

LEVEL 3

26

14%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

58
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

70

35%

LEVEL 2

74

37%

LEVEL 3

43

21%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

4

67%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

106
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

86

26%

LEVEL 2

144

43%

LEVEL 3

73

22%

LEVEL 4

33

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

120
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

91

29%

LEVEL 2

108

34%

LEVEL 3

82

26%

LEVEL 4

38

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

13

48%

LEVEL 2

7

26%

LEVEL 3

4

15%

LEVEL 4

3

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

12

38%

LEVEL 2

6

19%

LEVEL 3

7

22%

LEVEL 4

7

22%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

112
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

69

22%

LEVEL 2

131

42%

LEVEL 3

76

24%

LEVEL 4

36

12%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

124
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

76

25%

LEVEL 2

107

35%

LEVEL 3

80

26%

LEVEL 4

44

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

34

52%

LEVEL 2

27

42%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

37

55%

LEVEL 2

16

24%

LEVEL 3

12

18%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

116
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

96

26%

LEVEL 2

157

43%

LEVEL 3

79

21%

LEVEL 4

37

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

138
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

102

28%

LEVEL 2

122

34%

LEVEL 3

92

25%

LEVEL 4

46

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

7

88%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

11

92%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

17

24%

LEVEL 2

34

49%

LEVEL 3

12

17%

LEVEL 4

7

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

19

27%

LEVEL 2

23

32%

LEVEL 3

18

25%

LEVEL 4

11

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

97
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

86

28%

LEVEL 2

124

40%

LEVEL 3

67

22%

LEVEL 4

30

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

109
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

94

31%

LEVEL 2

100

33%

LEVEL 3

74

24%

LEVEL 4

35

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

111
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 349

LEVEL 1

91

26%

LEVEL 2

147

42%

LEVEL 3

75

21%

LEVEL 4

36

10%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

127
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

102

30%

LEVEL 2

109

32%

LEVEL 3

82

24%

LEVEL 4

45

13%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

12

43%

LEVEL 2

11

39%

LEVEL 3

4

14%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

11
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

11

31%

LEVEL 2

14

39%

LEVEL 3

10

28%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.