Skip to Content
Main content

BROOKLYN SCHOOL OF INQUIRY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

332
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

25

7%

LEVEL 3

122

34%

LEVEL 4

210

58%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

288
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

27

9%

LEVEL 3

108

34%

LEVEL 4

180

57%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

172
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

12

6%

LEVEL 3

54

29%

LEVEL 4

118

64%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

158
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

11

6%

LEVEL 3

57

34%

LEVEL 4

101

59%

MALE

PROFICIENT

160
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

13

7%

LEVEL 3

68

39%

LEVEL 4

92

53%

MALE

PROFICIENT

130
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

16

11%

LEVEL 3

51

35%

LEVEL 4

79

54%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

70
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

4%

LEVEL 3

20

27%

LEVEL 4

50

68%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

65
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

4%

LEVEL 3

20

29%

LEVEL 4

45

66%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

226
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

18

7%

LEVEL 3

91

37%

LEVEL 4

135

55%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

190
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

21

10%

LEVEL 3

73

34%

LEVEL 4

117

55%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

2

12%

LEVEL 2

3

18%

LEVEL 3

3

18%

LEVEL 4

9

53%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

6

43%

LEVEL 4

8

57%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

5

31%

LEVEL 4

10

63%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

14%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

8

57%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

328
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

23

7%

LEVEL 3

119

34%

LEVEL 4

209

59%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

283
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

20

7%

LEVEL 3

105

35%

LEVEL 4

178

59%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

7

54%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

328
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

22

6%

LEVEL 3

118

33%

LEVEL 4

210

59%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

283
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

24

8%

LEVEL 3

103

33%

LEVEL 4

180

58%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

4

57%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

5

63%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

276
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

21

7%

LEVEL 3

96

32%

LEVEL 4

180

60%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

227
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

19

8%

LEVEL 3

86

35%

LEVEL 4

141

57%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

4

6%

LEVEL 3

26

42%

LEVEL 4

30

48%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

8

11%

LEVEL 3

22

31%

LEVEL 4

39

56%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.