DEMOCRACY PREP HARLEM CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

237
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 463

LEVEL 1

86

19%

LEVEL 2

140

30%

LEVEL 3

178

38%

LEVEL 4

59

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

260
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 523

LEVEL 1

100

19%

LEVEL 2

163

31%

LEVEL 3

185

35%

LEVEL 4

75

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

131
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

38

16%

LEVEL 2

68

29%

LEVEL 3

95

40%

LEVEL 4

36

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

139
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

36

14%

LEVEL 2

81

32%

LEVEL 3

99

39%

LEVEL 4

40

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

106
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

48

21%

LEVEL 2

72

32%

LEVEL 3

83

37%

LEVEL 4

23

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

121
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

64

24%

LEVEL 2

82

31%

LEVEL 3

86

32%

LEVEL 4

35

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

158
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

58

19%

LEVEL 2

93

30%

LEVEL 3

121

39%

LEVEL 4

37

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

170
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

70

20%

LEVEL 2

111

32%

LEVEL 3

121

34%

LEVEL 4

49

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

74
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

26

18%

LEVEL 2

44

31%

LEVEL 3

53

37%

LEVEL 4

21

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

84
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

27

17%

LEVEL 2

49

31%

LEVEL 3

61

38%

LEVEL 4

23

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

217
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

49

13%

LEVEL 2

114

30%

LEVEL 3

160

42%

LEVEL 4

57

15%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

233
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

61

15%

LEVEL 2

120

29%

LEVEL 3

159

38%

LEVEL 4

74

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

20
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

37

45%

LEVEL 2

26

31%

LEVEL 3

18

22%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

27
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

39

36%

LEVEL 2

43

39%

LEVEL 3

26

24%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

228
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 428

LEVEL 1

68

16%

LEVEL 2

132

31%

LEVEL 3

169

39%

LEVEL 4

59

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

253
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 483

LEVEL 1

84

17%

LEVEL 2

146

30%

LEVEL 3

179

37%

LEVEL 4

74

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

9
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

18

51%

LEVEL 2

8

23%

LEVEL 3

9

26%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

7
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

16

40%

LEVEL 2

17

43%

LEVEL 3

6

15%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

9

16%

LEVEL 2

18

31%

LEVEL 3

21

36%

LEVEL 4

10

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

13

22%

LEVEL 2

16

28%

LEVEL 3

21

36%

LEVEL 4

8

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

206
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 405

LEVEL 1

77

19%

LEVEL 2

122

30%

LEVEL 3

157

39%

LEVEL 4

49

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

231
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 465

LEVEL 1

87

19%

LEVEL 2

147

32%

LEVEL 3

164

35%

LEVEL 4

67

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

205
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

76

18%

LEVEL 2

130

32%

LEVEL 3

156

38%

LEVEL 4

49

12%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

32
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

10

19%

LEVEL 2

10

19%

LEVEL 3

22

42%

LEVEL 4

10

19%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.