NEW WORLD PREP CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

142
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

85

23%

LEVEL 2

146

39%

LEVEL 3

96

26%

LEVEL 4

46

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

137
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 407

LEVEL 1

142

35%

LEVEL 2

128

31%

LEVEL 3

101

25%

LEVEL 4

36

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

84
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

33

17%

LEVEL 2

83

42%

LEVEL 3

53

27%

LEVEL 4

31

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

79
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

56

28%

LEVEL 2

68

33%

LEVEL 3

55

27%

LEVEL 4

24

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

58
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

52

30%

LEVEL 2

63

36%

LEVEL 3

43

25%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

58
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

86

42%

LEVEL 2

60

29%

LEVEL 3

46

23%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

4
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

7

37%

LEVEL 2

8

42%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

5

33%

LEVEL 2

7

47%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

53
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

12

13%

LEVEL 2

30

32%

LEVEL 3

32

34%

LEVEL 4

21

22%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

44
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

26

29%

LEVEL 2

21

23%

LEVEL 3

36

40%

LEVEL 4

8

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

79
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

65

26%

LEVEL 2

106

42%

LEVEL 3

60

24%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

84
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

109

37%

LEVEL 2

100

34%

LEVEL 3

60

20%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

128
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

44

16%

LEVEL 2

106

38%

LEVEL 3

85

31%

LEVEL 4

43

15%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

127
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

74

25%

LEVEL 2

100

33%

LEVEL 3

94

31%

LEVEL 4

33

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

41

43%

LEVEL 2

40

42%

LEVEL 3

11

12%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

68

64%

LEVEL 2

28

26%

LEVEL 3

7

7%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

141
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

55

17%

LEVEL 2

131

40%

LEVEL 3

95

29%

LEVEL 4

46

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

135
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

96

28%

LEVEL 2

116

33%

LEVEL 3

99

29%

LEVEL 4

36

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

30

65%

LEVEL 2

15

33%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

46

77%

LEVEL 2

12

20%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

32%

LEVEL 3

9

41%

LEVEL 4

6

27%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

8

24%

LEVEL 2

8

24%

LEVEL 3

12

35%

LEVEL 4

6

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

127
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

85

24%

LEVEL 2

139

40%

LEVEL 3

87

25%

LEVEL 4

40

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

119
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

134

36%

LEVEL 2

120

32%

LEVEL 3

89

24%

LEVEL 4

30

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

135
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

82

23%

LEVEL 2

143

40%

LEVEL 3

92

26%

LEVEL 4

43

12%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

3

23%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.