Skip to Content
Main content

SUCCESS ACADEMY CS-BED STUY 1 GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

379
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

8

2%

LEVEL 2

27

7%

LEVEL 3

168

41%

LEVEL 4

211

51%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

412
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 454

LEVEL 1

6

1%

LEVEL 2

36

8%

LEVEL 3

197

43%

LEVEL 4

215

47%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

198
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

10

5%

LEVEL 3

76

36%

LEVEL 4

122

58%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

209
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

15

7%

LEVEL 3

91

40%

LEVEL 4

118

52%

MALE

PROFICIENT

181
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

17

8%

LEVEL 3

92

45%

LEVEL 4

89

44%

MALE

PROFICIENT

203
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

21

9%

LEVEL 3

106

46%

LEVEL 4

97

43%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

3

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

7
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

4

44%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

269
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

17

6%

LEVEL 3

128

44%

LEVEL 4

141

48%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

280
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

20

7%

LEVEL 3

141

47%

LEVEL 4

139

46%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

91
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

9

9%

LEVEL 3

36

36%

LEVEL 4

55

55%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

113
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

13

10%

LEVEL 3

46

36%

LEVEL 4

67

52%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

317
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

11

3%

LEVEL 3

117

36%

LEVEL 4

200

61%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

336
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

22

6%

LEVEL 3

143

40%

LEVEL 4

193

53%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

62
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

7

8%

LEVEL 2

16

19%

LEVEL 3

51

60%

LEVEL 4

11

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

76
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

14

15%

LEVEL 3

54

58%

LEVEL 4

22

24%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

82
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

5

6%

LEVEL 3

33

38%

LEVEL 4

49

56%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

74
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

9

11%

LEVEL 3

31

36%

LEVEL 4

43

51%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

297
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

7

2%

LEVEL 2

22

7%

LEVEL 3

135

41%

LEVEL 4

162

50%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

338
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

27

7%

LEVEL 3

166

45%

LEVEL 4

172

47%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

348
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

26

7%

LEVEL 3

154

41%

LEVEL 4

194

51%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

31
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

1

3%

LEVEL 3

14

41%

LEVEL 4

17

50%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.