EXPLORE EXCEL CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

170
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 349

LEVEL 1

55

16%

LEVEL 2

124

36%

LEVEL 3

112

32%

LEVEL 4

58

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

159
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

70

20%

LEVEL 2

123

35%

LEVEL 3

110

31%

LEVEL 4

49

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

99
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

19

11%

LEVEL 2

59

33%

LEVEL 3

54

31%

LEVEL 4

45

25%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

89
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

27

16%

LEVEL 2

50

30%

LEVEL 3

58

35%

LEVEL 4

31

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

71
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

36

21%

LEVEL 2

65

38%

LEVEL 3

58

34%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

70
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

43

23%

LEVEL 2

73

39%

LEVEL 3

52

28%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

152
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

52

16%

LEVEL 2

113

36%

LEVEL 3

99

31%

LEVEL 4

53

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

144
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

66

20%

LEVEL 2

117

36%

LEVEL 3

96

29%

LEVEL 4

48

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

2

10%

LEVEL 2

7

33%

LEVEL 3

10

48%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

2

14%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

8

57%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

152
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

24

9%

LEVEL 2

90

34%

LEVEL 3

97

36%

LEVEL 4

55

21%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

146
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

32

12%

LEVEL 2

89

33%

LEVEL 3

101

38%

LEVEL 4

45

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

18
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

31

37%

LEVEL 2

34

41%

LEVEL 3

15

18%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

38

45%

LEVEL 2

34

40%

LEVEL 3

9

11%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

168
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

47

14%

LEVEL 2

115

35%

LEVEL 3

110

33%

LEVEL 4

58

18%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

155
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

63

19%

LEVEL 2

118

35%

LEVEL 3

107

32%

LEVEL 4

48

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

8

42%

LEVEL 2

9

47%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

7

44%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

11

14%

LEVEL 2

20

25%

LEVEL 3

28

35%

LEVEL 4

22

27%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

11

13%

LEVEL 2

22

26%

LEVEL 3

30

36%

LEVEL 4

21

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

120
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

44

16%

LEVEL 2

104

39%

LEVEL 3

84

31%

LEVEL 4

36

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

108
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

59

22%

LEVEL 2

101

38%

LEVEL 3

80

30%

LEVEL 4

28

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

164
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

53

16%

LEVEL 2

117

35%

LEVEL 3

108

32%

LEVEL 4

56

17%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

7

47%

LEVEL 3

4

27%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.