BEGINNING WITH CHILDREN CHARTER II GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

107
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

26

13%

LEVEL 2

66

33%

LEVEL 3

76

38%

LEVEL 4

31

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

128
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

42

17%

LEVEL 2

74

30%

LEVEL 3

97

40%

LEVEL 4

31

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

62
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

13

12%

LEVEL 2

32

30%

LEVEL 3

46

43%

LEVEL 4

16

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

75
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

22

16%

LEVEL 2

39

29%

LEVEL 3

54

40%

LEVEL 4

21

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

45
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

13

14%

LEVEL 2

34

37%

LEVEL 3

30

33%

LEVEL 4

15

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

53
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

20

19%

LEVEL 2

35

32%

LEVEL 3

43

40%

LEVEL 4

10

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

29
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

9

15%

LEVEL 2

21

36%

LEVEL 3

19

32%

LEVEL 4

10

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

24
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

10

17%

LEVEL 2

26

43%

LEVEL 3

17

28%

LEVEL 4

7

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

74
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

16

12%

LEVEL 2

43

32%

LEVEL 3

54

41%

LEVEL 4

20

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

99
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

31

18%

LEVEL 2

47

27%

LEVEL 3

77

44%

LEVEL 4

22

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

92
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

13

9%

LEVEL 2

47

31%

LEVEL 3

66

43%

LEVEL 4

26

17%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

112
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

26

13%

LEVEL 2

55

28%

LEVEL 3

83

43%

LEVEL 4

29

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

13

28%

LEVEL 2

19

40%

LEVEL 3

10

21%

LEVEL 4

5

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

16

31%

LEVEL 2

19

37%

LEVEL 3

14

27%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

101
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

16

9%

LEVEL 2

58

33%

LEVEL 3

70

40%

LEVEL 4

31

18%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

121
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

27

13%

LEVEL 2

67

31%

LEVEL 3

90

42%

LEVEL 4

31

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

10

42%

LEVEL 2

8

33%

LEVEL 3

6

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

7
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

15

52%

LEVEL 2

7

24%

LEVEL 3

7

24%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

12%

LEVEL 3

10

59%

LEVEL 4

5

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

11

61%

LEVEL 4

5

28%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

92
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

26

14%

LEVEL 2

64

35%

LEVEL 3

66

36%

LEVEL 4

26

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

112
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

41

18%

LEVEL 2

73

32%

LEVEL 3

86

38%

LEVEL 4

26

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

105
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

23

12%

LEVEL 2

61

32%

LEVEL 3

75

40%

LEVEL 4

30

16%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.