Skip to Content
Main content

WAVE PREPARATORY ELEMENTARY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

134
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

44

18%

LEVEL 2

69

28%

LEVEL 3

89

36%

LEVEL 4

45

18%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

150
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

35

15%

LEVEL 2

46

20%

LEVEL 3

70

30%

LEVEL 4

80

35%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

70
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

20

16%

LEVEL 2

33

27%

LEVEL 3

48

39%

LEVEL 4

22

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

72
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

13

11%

LEVEL 2

30

26%

LEVEL 3

24

21%

LEVEL 4

48

42%

MALE

PROFICIENT

64
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

24

19%

LEVEL 2

36

29%

LEVEL 3

41

33%

LEVEL 4

23

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

78
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

22

19%

LEVEL 2

16

14%

LEVEL 3

46

40%

LEVEL 4

32

28%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

53
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

15

16%

LEVEL 2

27

28%

LEVEL 3

31

33%

LEVEL 4

22

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

58
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

21

22%

LEVEL 2

17

18%

LEVEL 3

31

32%

LEVEL 4

27

28%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

76
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

27

19%

LEVEL 2

42

29%

LEVEL 3

55

38%

LEVEL 4

21

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

86
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

14

11%

LEVEL 2

27

21%

LEVEL 3

38

30%

LEVEL 4

48

38%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

128
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

19

10%

LEVEL 2

53

27%

LEVEL 3

83

42%

LEVEL 4

45

23%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

139
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

16

9%

LEVEL 2

33

18%

LEVEL 3

62

33%

LEVEL 4

77

41%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

25

53%

LEVEL 2

16

34%

LEVEL 3

6

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

19

44%

LEVEL 2

13

30%

LEVEL 3

8

19%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

120
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

27

13%

LEVEL 2

59

29%

LEVEL 3

76

37%

LEVEL 4

44

21%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

142
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

27

13%

LEVEL 2

39

19%

LEVEL 3

67

32%

LEVEL 4

75

36%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

14
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

17

41%

LEVEL 2

10

24%

LEVEL 3

13

32%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

8
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

8

35%

LEVEL 2

7

30%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

5

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

3

11%

LEVEL 2

5

19%

LEVEL 3

11

41%

LEVEL 4

8

30%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

9

38%

LEVEL 3

5

21%

LEVEL 4

9

38%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

115
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

41

19%

LEVEL 2

64

29%

LEVEL 3

78

35%

LEVEL 4

37

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

136
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

34

16%

LEVEL 2

37

18%

LEVEL 3

65

31%

LEVEL 4

71

34%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

123
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

36

16%

LEVEL 2

62

28%

LEVEL 3

80

36%

LEVEL 4

43

19%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

127
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

26

13%

LEVEL 2

40

21%

LEVEL 3

61

32%

LEVEL 4

66

34%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

11
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

8

31%

LEVEL 2

7

27%

LEVEL 3

9

35%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

23
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

9

24%

LEVEL 2

6

16%

LEVEL 3

9

24%

LEVEL 4

14

37%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.