ACHIEVEMENT FIRST NORTH BROOKLYN PRE GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

13

7%

LEVEL 2

38

22%

LEVEL 3

92

53%

LEVEL 4

31

18%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

158
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

25

10%

LEVEL 2

63

26%

LEVEL 3

113

46%

LEVEL 4

45

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

65
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

6

7%

LEVEL 2

16

18%

LEVEL 3

48

55%

LEVEL 4

17

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

86
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

7

6%

LEVEL 2

22

19%

LEVEL 3

63

55%

LEVEL 4

23

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

58
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

7

8%

LEVEL 2

22

25%

LEVEL 3

44

51%

LEVEL 4

14

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

72
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

18

14%

LEVEL 2

41

31%

LEVEL 3

50

38%

LEVEL 4

22

17%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

28
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

4

9%

LEVEL 2

14

30%

LEVEL 3

19

41%

LEVEL 4

9

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

84
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

10

8%

LEVEL 2

28

23%

LEVEL 3

63

52%

LEVEL 4

21

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

125
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

20

10%

LEVEL 2

48

25%

LEVEL 3

89

46%

LEVEL 4

36

19%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

114
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

28

19%

LEVEL 3

83

57%

LEVEL 4

31

21%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

145
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

17

8%

LEVEL 2

48

23%

LEVEL 3

101

48%

LEVEL 4

44

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

9

32%

LEVEL 2

10

36%

LEVEL 3

9

32%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

8

22%

LEVEL 2

15

42%

LEVEL 3

12

33%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

112
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

11

7%

LEVEL 2

28

19%

LEVEL 3

82

54%

LEVEL 4

30

20%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

147
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

19

9%

LEVEL 2

55

25%

LEVEL 3

103

47%

LEVEL 4

44

20%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

11
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

2

9%

LEVEL 2

10

43%

LEVEL 3

10

43%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

11
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

6

24%

LEVEL 2

8

32%

LEVEL 3

10

40%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

2

10%

LEVEL 2

4

20%

LEVEL 3

7

35%

LEVEL 4

7

35%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

3

13%

LEVEL 2

5

21%

LEVEL 3

11

46%

LEVEL 4

5

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

109
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

11

7%

LEVEL 2

34

22%

LEVEL 3

85

55%

LEVEL 4

24

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

142
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

22

10%

LEVEL 2

58

26%

LEVEL 3

102

46%

LEVEL 4

40

18%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

115
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

13

8%

LEVEL 2

32

20%

LEVEL 3

84

53%

LEVEL 4

31

19%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

8
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

43%

LEVEL 3

8

57%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.