NEW BRIDGES ELEMENTARY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

56
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

49

29%

LEVEL 2

63

38%

LEVEL 3

45

27%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

68
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

51

30%

LEVEL 2

53

31%

LEVEL 3

59

34%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

37
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

19

22%

LEVEL 2

30

35%

LEVEL 3

30

35%

LEVEL 4

7

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

39
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

12

15%

LEVEL 2

28

35%

LEVEL 3

33

42%

LEVEL 4

6

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

19
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

30

37%

LEVEL 2

33

40%

LEVEL 3

15

18%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

29
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

39

42%

LEVEL 2

25

27%

LEVEL 3

26

28%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

7

78%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

39
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

28

25%

LEVEL 2

47

41%

LEVEL 3

33

29%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

48
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

35

29%

LEVEL 2

38

31%

LEVEL 3

41

34%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

14

33%

LEVEL 2

14

33%

LEVEL 3

10

24%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

6

16%

LEVEL 2

14

38%

LEVEL 3

16

43%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

48
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

29

24%

LEVEL 2

45

37%

LEVEL 3

38

31%

LEVEL 4

10

8%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

59
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

29

22%

LEVEL 2

42

32%

LEVEL 3

52

40%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

20

43%

LEVEL 2

18

39%

LEVEL 3

7

15%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

22

52%

LEVEL 2

11

26%

LEVEL 3

7

17%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

55
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

33

23%

LEVEL 2

56

39%

LEVEL 3

44

31%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

68
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

40

25%

LEVEL 2

49

31%

LEVEL 3

59

38%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

16

67%

LEVEL 2

7

29%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

11

73%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

4

22%

LEVEL 2

6

33%

LEVEL 3

6

33%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

3

21%

LEVEL 2

2

14%

LEVEL 3

7

50%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

45

30%

LEVEL 2

57

38%

LEVEL 3

39

26%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

48

30%

LEVEL 2

51

32%

LEVEL 3

52

33%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

44
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

36

28%

LEVEL 2

50

38%

LEVEL 3

37

28%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

47
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

40

31%

LEVEL 2

41

32%

LEVEL 3

41

32%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

12
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

13

34%

LEVEL 2

13

34%

LEVEL 3

8

21%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

21
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

11

25%

LEVEL 2

12

27%

LEVEL 3

18

41%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.