VISTA ACADEMY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

174
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 417

LEVEL 1

111

27%

LEVEL 2

132

32%

LEVEL 3

115

28%

LEVEL 4

59

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

194
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 448

LEVEL 1

127

28%

LEVEL 2

127

28%

LEVEL 3

134

30%

LEVEL 4

60

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

103
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

42

19%

LEVEL 2

79

35%

LEVEL 3

65

29%

LEVEL 4

38

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

115
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

37

17%

LEVEL 2

70

32%

LEVEL 3

73

33%

LEVEL 4

42

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

71
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

69

36%

LEVEL 2

53

27%

LEVEL 3

50

26%

LEVEL 4

21

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

79
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

90

40%

LEVEL 2

57

25%

LEVEL 3

61

27%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

4
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

6

50%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

5
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

15
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

3

14%

LEVEL 2

4

18%

LEVEL 3

10

45%

LEVEL 4

5

23%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

18
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

4

14%

LEVEL 2

6

21%

LEVEL 3

9

32%

LEVEL 4

9

32%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

32
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

31

31%

LEVEL 2

38

38%

LEVEL 3

25

25%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

44
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

28

27%

LEVEL 2

30

29%

LEVEL 3

33

32%

LEVEL 4

11

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

119
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

73

27%

LEVEL 2

80

29%

LEVEL 3

76

28%

LEVEL 4

43

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

122
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

88

30%

LEVEL 2

85

29%

LEVEL 3

88

30%

LEVEL 4

34

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

160
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

65

19%

LEVEL 2

114

34%

LEVEL 3

102

30%

LEVEL 4

58

17%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

177
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

74

21%

LEVEL 2

106

30%

LEVEL 3

119

33%

LEVEL 4

58

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

46

59%

LEVEL 2

18

23%

LEVEL 3

13

17%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

17
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

53

58%

LEVEL 2

21

23%

LEVEL 3

15

16%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

173
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

83

22%

LEVEL 2

122

32%

LEVEL 3

114

30%

LEVEL 4

59

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

189
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

100

25%

LEVEL 2

114

28%

LEVEL 3

130

32%

LEVEL 4

59

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

28

72%

LEVEL 2

10

26%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

27

60%

LEVEL 2

13

29%

LEVEL 3

4

9%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

3

33%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

3

19%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

7

44%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

168
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 408

LEVEL 1

109

27%

LEVEL 2

131

32%

LEVEL 3

112

27%

LEVEL 4

56

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

185
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 432

LEVEL 1

124

29%

LEVEL 2

123

28%

LEVEL 3

127

29%

LEVEL 4

58

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

159
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

93

26%

LEVEL 2

109

30%

LEVEL 3

104

29%

LEVEL 4

55

15%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

172
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 385

LEVEL 1

102

26%

LEVEL 2

111

29%

LEVEL 3

117

30%

LEVEL 4

55

14%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

15
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

18

32%

LEVEL 2

23

41%

LEVEL 3

11

20%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

22
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

25

40%

LEVEL 2

16

25%

LEVEL 3

17

27%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.