ONEIDA MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

127
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 555

LEVEL 1

267

48%

LEVEL 2

161

29%

LEVEL 3

86

15%

LEVEL 4

41

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

136
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 584

LEVEL 1

284

49%

LEVEL 2

164

28%

LEVEL 3

86

15%

LEVEL 4

50

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

75
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

105

41%

LEVEL 2

78

30%

LEVEL 3

48

19%

LEVEL 4

27

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

85
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

117

41%

LEVEL 2

80

28%

LEVEL 3

52

18%

LEVEL 4

33

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

162

55%

LEVEL 2

83

28%

LEVEL 3

38

13%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

51
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

167

55%

LEVEL 2

84

28%

LEVEL 3

34

11%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

17

52%

LEVEL 2

8

24%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

6

18%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

25
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

29

33%

LEVEL 2

34

39%

LEVEL 3

16

18%

LEVEL 4

9

10%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

31
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

34

33%

LEVEL 2

37

36%

LEVEL 3

22

22%

LEVEL 4

9

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

44
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

58

40%

LEVEL 2

44

30%

LEVEL 3

26

18%

LEVEL 4

18

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

44
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

58

42%

LEVEL 2

37

27%

LEVEL 3

29

21%

LEVEL 4

15

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

38
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

103

55%

LEVEL 2

45

24%

LEVEL 3

31

17%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

27
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

101

59%

LEVEL 2

44

26%

LEVEL 3

14

8%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

68

58%

LEVEL 2

33

28%

LEVEL 3

12

10%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

26
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

74

54%

LEVEL 2

38

28%

LEVEL 3

19

14%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

124
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 443

LEVEL 1

181

41%

LEVEL 2

138

31%

LEVEL 3

83

19%

LEVEL 4

41

9%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

131
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 471

LEVEL 1

194

41%

LEVEL 2

146

31%

LEVEL 3

82

17%

LEVEL 4

49

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

86

77%

LEVEL 2

23

21%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

90

80%

LEVEL 2

18

16%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

134
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 547

LEVEL 1

251

46%

LEVEL 2

162

30%

LEVEL 3

84

15%

LEVEL 4

50

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

33

89%

LEVEL 2

2

5%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

19

22%

LEVEL 2

24

28%

LEVEL 3

22

26%

LEVEL 4

20

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

39

29%

LEVEL 2

46

34%

LEVEL 3

31

23%

LEVEL 4

19

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

85
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 470

LEVEL 1

248

53%

LEVEL 2

137

29%

LEVEL 3

64

14%

LEVEL 4

21

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

86
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 449

LEVEL 1

245

55%

LEVEL 2

118

26%

LEVEL 3

55

12%

LEVEL 4

31

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

124
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 538

LEVEL 1

257

48%

LEVEL 2

157

29%

LEVEL 3

86

16%

LEVEL 4

38

7%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

134
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 575

LEVEL 1

280

49%

LEVEL 2

161

28%

LEVEL 3

85

15%

LEVEL 4

49

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

10

59%

LEVEL 2

4

24%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

3

18%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.