Skip to Content
Main content

RICHMOND COUNTY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

9,071
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 27,181

LEVEL 1

8,137

30%

LEVEL 2

9,973

37%

LEVEL 3

6,028

22%

LEVEL 4

3,043

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

10,426
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 26,760

LEVEL 1

7,353

27%

LEVEL 2

8,981

34%

LEVEL 3

6,532

24%

LEVEL 4

3,894

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

4,316
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,067

LEVEL 1

3,808

29%

LEVEL 2

4,943

38%

LEVEL 3

2,899

22%

LEVEL 4

1,417

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

5,126
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,987

LEVEL 1

3,395

26%

LEVEL 2

4,466

34%

LEVEL 3

3,237

25%

LEVEL 4

1,889

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

4,755
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 14,114

LEVEL 1

4,329

31%

LEVEL 2

5,030

36%

LEVEL 3

3,129

22%

LEVEL 4

1,626

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

5,300
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,773

LEVEL 1

3,958

29%

LEVEL 2

4,515

33%

LEVEL 3

3,295

24%

LEVEL 4

2,005

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

42
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

32

27%

LEVEL 2

45

38%

LEVEL 3

25

21%

LEVEL 4

17

14%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

71
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

44

27%

LEVEL 2

46

29%

LEVEL 3

46

29%

LEVEL 4

25

16%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

37
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

37

31%

LEVEL 2

46

38%

LEVEL 3

28

23%

LEVEL 4

9

8%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

39
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

32

29%

LEVEL 2

41

37%

LEVEL 3

24

21%

LEVEL 4

15

13%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1,335
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,162

LEVEL 1

246

11%

LEVEL 2

581

27%

LEVEL 3

714

33%

LEVEL 4

621

29%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1,415
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,055

LEVEL 1

197

10%

LEVEL 2

443

22%

LEVEL 3

704

34%

LEVEL 4

711

35%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

5,903
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 14,117

LEVEL 1

2,712

19%

LEVEL 2

5,502

39%

LEVEL 3

3,895

28%

LEVEL 4

2,008

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

6,608
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,675

LEVEL 1

2,361

17%

LEVEL 2

4,706

34%

LEVEL 3

4,039

30%

LEVEL 4

2,569

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

488
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,868

LEVEL 1

2,155

56%

LEVEL 2

1,225

32%

LEVEL 3

386

10%

LEVEL 4

102

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

634
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,719

LEVEL 1

1,882

51%

LEVEL 2

1,203

32%

LEVEL 3

488

13%

LEVEL 4

146

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1,266
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,795

LEVEL 1

2,955

43%

LEVEL 2

2,574

38%

LEVEL 3

980

14%

LEVEL 4

286

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1,659
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,038

LEVEL 1

2,837

40%

LEVEL 2

2,542

36%

LEVEL 3

1,231

17%

LEVEL 4

428

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

8,458
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 21,073

LEVEL 1

4,336

21%

LEVEL 2

8,279

39%

LEVEL 3

5,552

26%

LEVEL 4

2,906

14%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

9,562
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 19,700

LEVEL 1

3,235

16%

LEVEL 2

6,903

35%

LEVEL 3

5,879

30%

LEVEL 4

3,683

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

613
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,108

LEVEL 1

3,801

62%

LEVEL 2

1,694

28%

LEVEL 3

476

8%

LEVEL 4

137

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

864
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,060

LEVEL 1

4,118

58%

LEVEL 2

2,078

29%

LEVEL 3

653

9%

LEVEL 4

211

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

8,953
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 25,780

LEVEL 1

7,217

28%

LEVEL 2

9,610

37%

LEVEL 3

5,929

23%

LEVEL 4

3,024

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

10,282
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 25,354

LEVEL 1

6,465

25%

LEVEL 2

8,607

34%

LEVEL 3

6,416

25%

LEVEL 4

3,866

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

118
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,401

LEVEL 1

920

66%

LEVEL 2

363

26%

LEVEL 3

99

7%

LEVEL 4

19

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

144
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,406

LEVEL 1

888

63%

LEVEL 2

374

27%

LEVEL 3

116

8%

LEVEL 4

28

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5,086
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,559

LEVEL 1

1,685

16%

LEVEL 2

3,788

36%

LEVEL 3

3,149

30%

LEVEL 4

1,937

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5,733
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,402

LEVEL 1

1,349

13%

LEVEL 2

3,320

32%

LEVEL 3

3,306

32%

LEVEL 4

2,427

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3,985
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 16,622

LEVEL 1

6,452

39%

LEVEL 2

6,185

37%

LEVEL 3

2,879

17%

LEVEL 4

1,106

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4,693
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 16,358

LEVEL 1

6,004

37%

LEVEL 2

5,661

35%

LEVEL 3

3,226

20%

LEVEL 4

1,467

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.