Skip to Content
Main content

GORHAM-MIDDLESEX CSD (MARCUS WHITMAN GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

142
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 527

LEVEL 1

176

33%

LEVEL 2

209

40%

LEVEL 3

103

20%

LEVEL 4

39

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

157
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 540

LEVEL 1

191

35%

LEVEL 2

192

36%

LEVEL 3

118

22%

LEVEL 4

39

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

60
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

80

32%

LEVEL 2

108

44%

LEVEL 3

46

19%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

74
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

93

36%

LEVEL 2

90

35%

LEVEL 3

60

23%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

82
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

96

34%

LEVEL 2

101

36%

LEVEL 3

57

20%

LEVEL 4

25

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

83
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

98

35%

LEVEL 2

102

36%

LEVEL 3

58

20%

LEVEL 4

25

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

138
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 508

LEVEL 1

170

33%

LEVEL 2

200

39%

LEVEL 3

99

19%

LEVEL 4

39

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

154
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 522

LEVEL 1

183

35%

LEVEL 2

185

35%

LEVEL 3

115

22%

LEVEL 4

39

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

137
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 432

LEVEL 1

104

24%

LEVEL 2

191

44%

LEVEL 3

99

23%

LEVEL 4

38

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

150
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 436

LEVEL 1

108

25%

LEVEL 2

178

41%

LEVEL 3

113

26%

LEVEL 4

37

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

72

76%

LEVEL 2

18

19%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

83

80%

LEVEL 2

14

13%

LEVEL 3

5

5%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

117
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 393

LEVEL 1

108

27%

LEVEL 2

168

43%

LEVEL 3

85

22%

LEVEL 4

32

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

101
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

62

24%

LEVEL 2

98

38%

LEVEL 3

73

28%

LEVEL 4

28

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

68

51%

LEVEL 2

41

31%

LEVEL 3

18

13%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

129

46%

LEVEL 2

94

34%

LEVEL 3

45

16%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.