OAKFIELD-ALABAMA CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

84
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

113

31%

LEVEL 2

168

46%

LEVEL 3

63

17%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

135
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

76

22%

LEVEL 2

141

40%

LEVEL 3

101

29%

LEVEL 4

34

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

38
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

48

29%

LEVEL 2

81

49%

LEVEL 3

30

18%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

66
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

34

20%

LEVEL 2

70

41%

LEVEL 3

49

29%

LEVEL 4

17

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

46
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

65

33%

LEVEL 2

87

44%

LEVEL 3

33

17%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

69
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

42

23%

LEVEL 2

71

39%

LEVEL 3

52

29%

LEVEL 4

17

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

82
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

99

30%

LEVEL 2

154

46%

LEVEL 3

63

19%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

127
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

72

22%

LEVEL 2

124

38%

LEVEL 3

94

29%

LEVEL 4

33

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

10

53%

LEVEL 2

7

37%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

4

20%

LEVEL 2

10

50%

LEVEL 3

6

30%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

84
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

85

26%

LEVEL 2

160

49%

LEVEL 3

63

19%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

131
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

58

18%

LEVEL 2

132

41%

LEVEL 3

97

30%

LEVEL 4

34

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

28

78%

LEVEL 2

8

22%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

18

58%

LEVEL 2

9

29%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

84
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

111

31%

LEVEL 2

165

46%

LEVEL 3

63

18%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

135
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

74

21%

LEVEL 2

137

40%

LEVEL 3

101

29%

LEVEL 4

34

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

4

67%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

34

18%

LEVEL 2

94

49%

LEVEL 3

45

24%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

22

13%

LEVEL 2

69

40%

LEVEL 3

58

33%

LEVEL 4

25

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

79

45%

LEVEL 2

74

43%

LEVEL 3

18

10%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

54

30%

LEVEL 2

72

40%

LEVEL 3

43

24%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

135
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

74

21%

LEVEL 2

138

40%

LEVEL 3

101

29%

LEVEL 4

34

10%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.