Skip to Content
Main content

BRIARCLIFF MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

252
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

20

5%

LEVEL 2

101

27%

LEVEL 3

135

36%

LEVEL 4

117

31%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

204
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

17

6%

LEVEL 2

75

25%

LEVEL 3

97

33%

LEVEL 4

107

36%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

110
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

13

8%

LEVEL 2

50

29%

LEVEL 3

58

34%

LEVEL 4

52

30%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

96
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

10

7%

LEVEL 2

30

22%

LEVEL 3

50

37%

LEVEL 4

46

34%

MALE

PROFICIENT

142
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

51

26%

LEVEL 3

77

39%

LEVEL 4

65

33%

MALE

PROFICIENT

108
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

45

28%

LEVEL 3

47

29%

LEVEL 4

61

38%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

26
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

13%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

19

63%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

24
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

8%

LEVEL 3

7

27%

LEVEL 4

17

65%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

214
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

20

6%

LEVEL 2

91

28%

LEVEL 3

122

38%

LEVEL 4

92

28%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

167
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

17

7%

LEVEL 2

67

27%

LEVEL 3

83

33%

LEVEL 4

84

33%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

5

38%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

6

43%

LEVEL 4

5

36%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

245
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

8

2%

LEVEL 2

81

24%

LEVEL 3

129

39%

LEVEL 4

116

35%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

195
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

66

25%

LEVEL 3

90

34%

LEVEL 4

105

39%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

12

31%

LEVEL 2

20

51%

LEVEL 3

6

15%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

10

36%

LEVEL 2

9

32%

LEVEL 3

7

25%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.