GREENWICH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

79
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

103

33%

LEVEL 2

131

42%

LEVEL 3

63

20%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

104
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

71

24%

LEVEL 2

119

40%

LEVEL 3

81

28%

LEVEL 4

23

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

34
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

49

33%

LEVEL 2

64

44%

LEVEL 3

25

17%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

48
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

34

23%

LEVEL 2

64

44%

LEVEL 3

38

26%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

45
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

54

33%

LEVEL 2

67

40%

LEVEL 3

38

23%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

37

25%

LEVEL 2

55

37%

LEVEL 3

43

29%

LEVEL 4

13

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

76
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

101

33%

LEVEL 2

128

42%

LEVEL 3

60

20%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

102
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

69

24%

LEVEL 2

112

40%

LEVEL 3

79

28%

LEVEL 4

23

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

76
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

65

25%

LEVEL 2

122

46%

LEVEL 3

60

23%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

101
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

39

15%

LEVEL 2

112

44%

LEVEL 3

79

31%

LEVEL 4

22

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

38

76%

LEVEL 2

9

18%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

32

76%

LEVEL 2

7

17%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

58

26%

LEVEL 2

93

42%

LEVEL 3

57

25%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

96
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

40

19%

LEVEL 2

78

36%

LEVEL 3

74

35%

LEVEL 4

22

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

45

51%

LEVEL 2

38

43%

LEVEL 3

6

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

31

39%

LEVEL 2

41

51%

LEVEL 3

7

9%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.