Skip to Content
Main content

WILLIAM H BARTON INTERMEDIATE SCH GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

224
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 517

LEVEL 1

116

22%

LEVEL 2

177

34%

LEVEL 3

168

32%

LEVEL 4

56

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

254
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 506

LEVEL 1

101

20%

LEVEL 2

151

30%

LEVEL 3

156

31%

LEVEL 4

98

19%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

110
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

49

20%

LEVEL 2

86

35%

LEVEL 3

85

35%

LEVEL 4

25

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

118
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

46

19%

LEVEL 2

73

31%

LEVEL 3

78

33%

LEVEL 4

40

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

114
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

67

25%

LEVEL 2

91

33%

LEVEL 3

83

31%

LEVEL 4

31

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

136
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

55

20%

LEVEL 2

78

29%

LEVEL 3

78

29%

LEVEL 4

58

22%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

219
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 492

LEVEL 1

106

22%

LEVEL 2

167

34%

LEVEL 3

165

34%

LEVEL 4

54

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

241
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 469

LEVEL 1

90

19%

LEVEL 2

138

29%

LEVEL 3

150

32%

LEVEL 4

91

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

7

41%

LEVEL 2

3

18%

LEVEL 3

2

12%

LEVEL 4

5

29%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

222
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 460

LEVEL 1

69

15%

LEVEL 2

169

37%

LEVEL 3

166

36%

LEVEL 4

56

12%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

250
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 441

LEVEL 1

57

13%

LEVEL 2

134

30%

LEVEL 3

153

35%

LEVEL 4

97

22%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

47

82%

LEVEL 2

8

14%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

44

68%

LEVEL 2

17

26%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

202
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 416

LEVEL 1

72

17%

LEVEL 2

142

34%

LEVEL 3

147

35%

LEVEL 4

55

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

218
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

43

12%

LEVEL 2

105

29%

LEVEL 3

129

35%

LEVEL 4

89

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

44

44%

LEVEL 2

35

35%

LEVEL 3

21

21%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

58

41%

LEVEL 2

46

33%

LEVEL 3

27

19%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.