Skip to Content
Main content

TIOGA CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

148
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 464

LEVEL 1

130

28%

LEVEL 2

186

40%

LEVEL 3

114

25%

LEVEL 4

34

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

193
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 428

LEVEL 1

90

21%

LEVEL 2

145

34%

LEVEL 3

109

25%

LEVEL 4

84

20%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

80
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

52

23%

LEVEL 2

96

42%

LEVEL 3

58

25%

LEVEL 4

22

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

98
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

43

20%

LEVEL 2

73

34%

LEVEL 3

53

25%

LEVEL 4

45

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

68
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

78

33%

LEVEL 2

90

38%

LEVEL 3

56

24%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

95
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

47

22%

LEVEL 2

72

34%

LEVEL 3

56

26%

LEVEL 4

39

18%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

146
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 452

LEVEL 1

127

28%

LEVEL 2

179

40%

LEVEL 3

112

25%

LEVEL 4

34

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

189
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 413

LEVEL 1

85

21%

LEVEL 2

139

34%

LEVEL 3

106

26%

LEVEL 4

83

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

148
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 409

LEVEL 1

86

21%

LEVEL 2

175

43%

LEVEL 3

114

28%

LEVEL 4

34

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

191
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

49

13%

LEVEL 2

135

36%

LEVEL 3

108

29%

LEVEL 4

83

22%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

44

80%

LEVEL 2

11

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

41

77%

LEVEL 2

10

19%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

94
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

32

16%

LEVEL 2

73

37%

LEVEL 3

68

34%

LEVEL 4

26

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

113
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

19

11%

LEVEL 2

46

26%

LEVEL 3

54

30%

LEVEL 4

59

33%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

98

37%

LEVEL 2

113

43%

LEVEL 3

46

17%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

80
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

71

28%

LEVEL 2

99

40%

LEVEL 3

55

22%

LEVEL 4

25

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.