Skip to Content
Main content

SPENCER-VAN ETTEN CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

87
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 441

LEVEL 1

165

37%

LEVEL 2

189

43%

LEVEL 3

68

15%

LEVEL 4

19

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

95
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 405

LEVEL 1

143

35%

LEVEL 2

167

41%

LEVEL 3

66

16%

LEVEL 4

29

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

41
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

75

36%

LEVEL 2

93

44%

LEVEL 3

31

15%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

65

33%

LEVEL 2

88

45%

LEVEL 3

32

16%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

46
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

90

39%

LEVEL 2

96

41%

LEVEL 3

37

16%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

51
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

78

38%

LEVEL 2

79

38%

LEVEL 3

34

16%

LEVEL 4

17

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

82
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 418

LEVEL 1

157

38%

LEVEL 2

179

43%

LEVEL 3

66

16%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

89
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

138

36%

LEVEL 2

156

41%

LEVEL 3

61

16%

LEVEL 4

28

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

5

71%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

86
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

114

30%

LEVEL 2

180

47%

LEVEL 3

67

18%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

92
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

92

27%

LEVEL 2

160

47%

LEVEL 3

63

18%

LEVEL 4

29

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

51

84%

LEVEL 2

9

15%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

51

84%

LEVEL 2

7

11%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

63

29%

LEVEL 2

91

42%

LEVEL 3

48

22%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

40

24%

LEVEL 2

72

43%

LEVEL 3

36

21%

LEVEL 4

21

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

102

45%

LEVEL 2

98

44%

LEVEL 3

20

9%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

103

44%

LEVEL 2

95

40%

LEVEL 3

30

13%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.