Skip to Content
Main content

MT SINAI MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

302
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 733

LEVEL 1

119

16%

LEVEL 2

312

43%

LEVEL 3

217

30%

LEVEL 4

85

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

227
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 497

LEVEL 1

86

17%

LEVEL 2

184

37%

LEVEL 3

142

29%

LEVEL 4

85

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

137
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

63

17%

LEVEL 2

165

45%

LEVEL 3

99

27%

LEVEL 4

38

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

103
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

48

20%

LEVEL 2

89

37%

LEVEL 3

66

28%

LEVEL 4

37

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

165
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

56

15%

LEVEL 2

147

40%

LEVEL 3

118

32%

LEVEL 4

47

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

124
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

38

15%

LEVEL 2

95

37%

LEVEL 3

76

30%

LEVEL 4

48

19%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

26
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

14

33%

LEVEL 3

14

33%

LEVEL 4

12

29%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

26
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

6

16%

LEVEL 2

6

16%

LEVEL 3

14

37%

LEVEL 4

12

32%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

264
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 645

LEVEL 1

104

16%

LEVEL 2

277

43%

LEVEL 3

194

30%

LEVEL 4

70

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

186
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 416

LEVEL 1

72

17%

LEVEL 2

158

38%

LEVEL 3

119

29%

LEVEL 4

67

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

10

29%

LEVEL 2

16

47%

LEVEL 3

5

15%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

4

14%

LEVEL 2

14

48%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

6

21%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

297
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 661

LEVEL 1

76

11%

LEVEL 2

288

44%

LEVEL 3

214

32%

LEVEL 4

83

13%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

221
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 447

LEVEL 1

58

13%

LEVEL 2

168

38%

LEVEL 3

138

31%

LEVEL 4

83

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

43

60%

LEVEL 2

24

33%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

28

56%

LEVEL 2

16

32%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

297
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 701

LEVEL 1

112

16%

LEVEL 2

292

42%

LEVEL 3

212

30%

LEVEL 4

85

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

219
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 471

LEVEL 1

78

17%

LEVEL 2

174

37%

LEVEL 3

136

29%

LEVEL 4

83

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

7

22%

LEVEL 2

20

63%

LEVEL 3

5

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

8

31%

LEVEL 2

10

38%

LEVEL 3

6

23%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.