Skip to Content
Main content

JESSIE T ZOLLER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

35
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

177

54%

LEVEL 2

113

35%

LEVEL 3

24

7%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

60
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

164

49%

LEVEL 2

114

34%

LEVEL 3

42

12%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

13
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

91

58%

LEVEL 2

52

33%

LEVEL 3

8

5%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

24
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

83

50%

LEVEL 2

60

36%

LEVEL 3

15

9%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

22
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

86

51%

LEVEL 2

61

36%

LEVEL 3

16

9%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

36
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

81

47%

LEVEL 2

54

32%

LEVEL 3

27

16%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

27

49%

LEVEL 2

16

29%

LEVEL 3

7

13%

LEVEL 4

5

9%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

16
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

18

37%

LEVEL 2

15

31%

LEVEL 3

13

27%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

16
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

54

43%

LEVEL 2

56

44%

LEVEL 3

12

10%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

27
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

57

42%

LEVEL 2

51

38%

LEVEL 3

16

12%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

60

65%

LEVEL 2

28

30%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

57

55%

LEVEL 2

33

32%

LEVEL 3

11

11%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

35
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

146

50%

LEVEL 2

109

38%

LEVEL 3

24

8%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

60
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

120

42%

LEVEL 2

108

38%

LEVEL 3

42

15%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

31

89%

LEVEL 2

4

11%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

44

88%

LEVEL 2

6

12%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

29

37%

LEVEL 2

30

38%

LEVEL 3

14

18%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

23

27%

LEVEL 2

30

36%

LEVEL 3

20

24%

LEVEL 4

11

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

148

60%

LEVEL 2

83

34%

LEVEL 3

10

4%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

141

56%

LEVEL 2

84

33%

LEVEL 3

22

9%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.