Skip to Content
Main content

MECHANICVILLE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

76
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

136

42%

LEVEL 2

113

35%

LEVEL 3

46

14%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

71
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

116

42%

LEVEL 2

91

33%

LEVEL 3

38

14%

LEVEL 4

33

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

30
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

70

43%

LEVEL 2

63

39%

LEVEL 3

19

12%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

29
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

65

46%

LEVEL 2

48

34%

LEVEL 3

18

13%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

46
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

66

41%

LEVEL 2

50

31%

LEVEL 3

27

17%

LEVEL 4

19

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

42
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

51

38%

LEVEL 2

43

32%

LEVEL 3

20

15%

LEVEL 4

22

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

72
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

127

41%

LEVEL 2

108

35%

LEVEL 3

44

14%

LEVEL 4

28

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

66
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

109

42%

LEVEL 2

86

33%

LEVEL 3

35

13%

LEVEL 4

31

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

75
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

103

37%

LEVEL 2

103

37%

LEVEL 3

45

16%

LEVEL 4

30

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

33

75%

LEVEL 2

10

23%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

77

37%

LEVEL 2

77

37%

LEVEL 3

30

14%

LEVEL 4

23

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

53

33%

LEVEL 2

58

36%

LEVEL 3

23

14%

LEVEL 4

28

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

59

50%

LEVEL 2

36

31%

LEVEL 3

16

14%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

63

54%

LEVEL 2

33

28%

LEVEL 3

15

13%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.