JOHN F KENNEDY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

52
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

131

40%

LEVEL 2

146

44%

LEVEL 3

41

12%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

98
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

126

38%

LEVEL 2

107

32%

LEVEL 3

70

21%

LEVEL 4

28

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

32
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

56

35%

LEVEL 2

74

46%

LEVEL 3

23

14%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

60

36%

LEVEL 2

53

32%

LEVEL 3

36

22%

LEVEL 4

16

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

20
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

75

45%

LEVEL 2

72

43%

LEVEL 3

18

11%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

46
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

66

40%

LEVEL 2

54

33%

LEVEL 3

34

20%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

50
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

127

40%

LEVEL 2

142

45%

LEVEL 3

39

12%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

97
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

123

38%

LEVEL 2

104

32%

LEVEL 3

69

21%

LEVEL 4

28

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

52
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

85

31%

LEVEL 2

139

50%

LEVEL 3

41

15%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

95
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

76

28%

LEVEL 2

101

37%

LEVEL 3

68

25%

LEVEL 4

27

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

46

87%

LEVEL 2

7

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

50

85%

LEVEL 2

6

10%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

35

28%

LEVEL 2

63

50%

LEVEL 3

23

18%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

33

23%

LEVEL 2

52

37%

LEVEL 3

42

30%

LEVEL 4

15

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

96

47%

LEVEL 2

83

41%

LEVEL 3

18

9%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

93

49%

LEVEL 2

55

29%

LEVEL 3

28

15%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.