MEXICO CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

185
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 919

LEVEL 1

340

37%

LEVEL 2

394

43%

LEVEL 3

155

17%

LEVEL 4

30

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

210
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 749

LEVEL 1

241

32%

LEVEL 2

298

40%

LEVEL 3

155

21%

LEVEL 4

55

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

85
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 466

LEVEL 1

177

38%

LEVEL 2

204

44%

LEVEL 3

75

16%

LEVEL 4

10

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

97
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

124

33%

LEVEL 2

158

42%

LEVEL 3

79

21%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

100
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 453

LEVEL 1

163

36%

LEVEL 2

190

42%

LEVEL 3

80

18%

LEVEL 4

20

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

113
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

117

32%

LEVEL 2

140

38%

LEVEL 3

76

21%

LEVEL 4

37

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

5

42%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

177
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 879

LEVEL 1

325

37%

LEVEL 2

377

43%

LEVEL 3

147

17%

LEVEL 4

30

3%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

206
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 722

LEVEL 1

230

32%

LEVEL 2

286

40%

LEVEL 3

152

21%

LEVEL 4

54

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

4

67%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

7

44%

LEVEL 2

7

44%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

7

70%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

182
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 754

LEVEL 1

218

29%

LEVEL 2

354

47%

LEVEL 3

153

20%

LEVEL 4

29

4%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

204
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 604

LEVEL 1

142

24%

LEVEL 2

258

43%

LEVEL 3

151

25%

LEVEL 4

53

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

122

74%

LEVEL 2

40

24%

LEVEL 3

2

1%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

99

68%

LEVEL 2

40

28%

LEVEL 3

4

3%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

133
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 491

LEVEL 1

139

28%

LEVEL 2

219

45%

LEVEL 3

110

22%

LEVEL 4

23

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

124
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

76

22%

LEVEL 2

140

41%

LEVEL 3

83

24%

LEVEL 4

41

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 428

LEVEL 1

201

47%

LEVEL 2

175

41%

LEVEL 3

45

11%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

86
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 409

LEVEL 1

165

40%

LEVEL 2

158

39%

LEVEL 3

72

18%

LEVEL 4

14

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.