TULLY CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

164
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 431

LEVEL 1

91

21%

LEVEL 2

176

41%

LEVEL 3

120

28%

LEVEL 4

44

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

156
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 399

LEVEL 1

93

23%

LEVEL 2

150

38%

LEVEL 3

121

30%

LEVEL 4

35

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

89
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

45

21%

LEVEL 2

80

37%

LEVEL 3

68

32%

LEVEL 4

21

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

79
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

43

21%

LEVEL 2

81

40%

LEVEL 3

61

30%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

75
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

46

21%

LEVEL 2

96

44%

LEVEL 3

52

24%

LEVEL 4

23

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

77
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

50

26%

LEVEL 2

69

35%

LEVEL 3

60

31%

LEVEL 4

17

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

162
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 413

LEVEL 1

84

20%

LEVEL 2

167

40%

LEVEL 3

118

29%

LEVEL 4

44

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

152
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

86

23%

LEVEL 2

143

38%

LEVEL 3

117

31%

LEVEL 4

35

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

162
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

45

12%

LEVEL 2

159

43%

LEVEL 3

118

32%

LEVEL 4

44

12%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

152
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

43

13%

LEVEL 2

143

42%

LEVEL 3

117

35%

LEVEL 4

35

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

46

71%

LEVEL 2

17

26%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

50

82%

LEVEL 2

7

11%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

145
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

60

18%

LEVEL 2

130

39%

LEVEL 3

104

31%

LEVEL 4

41

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

127
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

48

18%

LEVEL 2

99

36%

LEVEL 3

95

35%

LEVEL 4

32

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

31

32%

LEVEL 2

46

48%

LEVEL 3

16

17%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

45

36%

LEVEL 2

51

41%

LEVEL 3

26

21%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.