Skip to Content
Main content

GLEN HEAD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

144
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

30

12%

LEVEL 2

67

28%

LEVEL 3

77

32%

LEVEL 4

67

28%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

173
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

16

7%

LEVEL 2

44

19%

LEVEL 3

89

38%

LEVEL 4

84

36%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

69
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

13

11%

LEVEL 2

39

32%

LEVEL 3

33

27%

LEVEL 4

36

30%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

82
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

4

4%

LEVEL 2

23

21%

LEVEL 3

46

42%

LEVEL 4

36

33%

MALE

PROFICIENT

75
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

17

14%

LEVEL 2

28

23%

LEVEL 3

44

37%

LEVEL 4

31

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

91
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

12

10%

LEVEL 2

21

17%

LEVEL 3

43

35%

LEVEL 4

48

39%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

5

50%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

6

75%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

127
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

23

11%

LEVEL 2

52

26%

LEVEL 3

67

33%

LEVEL 4

60

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

151
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

10

5%

LEVEL 2

31

16%

LEVEL 3

79

41%

LEVEL 4

72

38%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

4

17%

LEVEL 2

11

48%

LEVEL 3

8

35%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

5

22%

LEVEL 2

8

35%

LEVEL 3

7

30%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

138
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

13

6%

LEVEL 2

58

28%

LEVEL 3

73

35%

LEVEL 4

65

31%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

160
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

33

16%

LEVEL 3

80

40%

LEVEL 4

80

40%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

17

53%

LEVEL 2

9

28%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

7

23%

LEVEL 2

11

35%

LEVEL 3

9

29%

LEVEL 4

4

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

141
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

26

11%

LEVEL 2

61

27%

LEVEL 3

75

33%

LEVEL 4

66

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

166
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

13

6%

LEVEL 2

37

17%

LEVEL 3

84

39%

LEVEL 4

82

38%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

4

31%

LEVEL 2

6

46%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

3

18%

LEVEL 2

7

41%

LEVEL 3

5

29%

LEVEL 4

2

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.