MORRISVILLE-EATON CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

58
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

157

48%

LEVEL 2

115

35%

LEVEL 3

52

16%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

66
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

120

40%

LEVEL 2

116

38%

LEVEL 3

49

16%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

31
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

85

50%

LEVEL 2

54

32%

LEVEL 3

28

16%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

33
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

57

39%

LEVEL 2

57

39%

LEVEL 3

23

16%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

27
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

72

45%

LEVEL 2

61

38%

LEVEL 3

24

15%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

33
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

63

41%

LEVEL 2

59

38%

LEVEL 3

26

17%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

53
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

150

49%

LEVEL 2

106

34%

LEVEL 3

47

15%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

59
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

119

42%

LEVEL 2

106

37%

LEVEL 3

43

15%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

58
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

106

39%

LEVEL 2

111

40%

LEVEL 3

52

19%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

66
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

76

31%

LEVEL 2

106

43%

LEVEL 3

49

20%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

51

93%

LEVEL 2

4

7%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

44

81%

LEVEL 2

10

19%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

49

32%

LEVEL 2

65

42%

LEVEL 3

35

23%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

47

32%

LEVEL 2

61

41%

LEVEL 3

29

19%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

108

61%

LEVEL 2

50

28%

LEVEL 3

17

10%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

73

48%

LEVEL 2

55

36%

LEVEL 3

20

13%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.