Skip to Content
Main content

EDEN CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

267
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 639

LEVEL 1

117

18%

LEVEL 2

255

40%

LEVEL 3

175

27%

LEVEL 4

92

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

279
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 607

LEVEL 1

111

18%

LEVEL 2

217

36%

LEVEL 3

169

28%

LEVEL 4

110

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

141
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

53

17%

LEVEL 2

122

39%

LEVEL 3

96

30%

LEVEL 4

45

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

150
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

49

16%

LEVEL 2

111

36%

LEVEL 3

91

29%

LEVEL 4

59

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

126
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

64

20%

LEVEL 2

133

41%

LEVEL 3

79

24%

LEVEL 4

47

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

129
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

62

21%

LEVEL 2

106

36%

LEVEL 3

78

26%

LEVEL 4

51

17%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

266
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 621

LEVEL 1

109

18%

LEVEL 2

246

40%

LEVEL 3

175

28%

LEVEL 4

91

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

273
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 588

LEVEL 1

101

17%

LEVEL 2

214

36%

LEVEL 3

166

28%

LEVEL 4

107

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

5

50%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

7

70%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

261
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 545

LEVEL 1

61

11%

LEVEL 2

223

41%

LEVEL 3

170

31%

LEVEL 4

91

17%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

272
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 518

LEVEL 1

55

11%

LEVEL 2

191

37%

LEVEL 3

162

31%

LEVEL 4

110

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

56

60%

LEVEL 2

32

34%

LEVEL 3

5

5%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

56

63%

LEVEL 2

26

29%

LEVEL 3

7

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

235
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 512

LEVEL 1

85

17%

LEVEL 2

192

38%

LEVEL 3

150

29%

LEVEL 4

85

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

245
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 480

LEVEL 1

63

13%

LEVEL 2

172

36%

LEVEL 3

148

31%

LEVEL 4

97

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

32

25%

LEVEL 2

63

50%

LEVEL 3

25

20%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

48

38%

LEVEL 2

45

35%

LEVEL 3

21

17%

LEVEL 4

13

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.