NORTHERN ADIRONDACK CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

94
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

129

33%

LEVEL 2

169

43%

LEVEL 3

81

21%

LEVEL 4

13

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

126
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

84

23%

LEVEL 2

153

42%

LEVEL 3

89

25%

LEVEL 4

37

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

73

38%

LEVEL 2

77

40%

LEVEL 3

37

19%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

61
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

41

22%

LEVEL 2

84

45%

LEVEL 3

47

25%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

50
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

56

28%

LEVEL 2

92

46%

LEVEL 3

44

22%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

65
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

43

24%

LEVEL 2

69

39%

LEVEL 3

42

24%

LEVEL 4

23

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

93
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

124

33%

LEVEL 2

164

43%

LEVEL 3

81

21%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

125
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

81

23%

LEVEL 2

151

42%

LEVEL 3

88

25%

LEVEL 4

37

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

92
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

78

24%

LEVEL 2

153

47%

LEVEL 3

79

24%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

49

16%

LEVEL 2

128

43%

LEVEL 3

87

29%

LEVEL 4

36

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

51

74%

LEVEL 2

16

23%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

35

56%

LEVEL 2

25

40%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

45

25%

LEVEL 2

84

47%

LEVEL 3

43

24%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

25

17%

LEVEL 2

55

37%

LEVEL 3

44

30%

LEVEL 4

23

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

84

39%

LEVEL 2

85

40%

LEVEL 3

38

18%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

59

27%

LEVEL 2

98

45%

LEVEL 3

45

21%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.