Skip to Content
Main content

CATO-MERIDIAN MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

97
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

109

33%

LEVEL 2

124

38%

LEVEL 3

69

21%

LEVEL 4

28

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

99
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

84

30%

LEVEL 2

98

35%

LEVEL 3

62

22%

LEVEL 4

37

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

49
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

56

35%

LEVEL 2

56

35%

LEVEL 3

33

20%

LEVEL 4

16

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

47
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

41

31%

LEVEL 2

43

33%

LEVEL 3

28

21%

LEVEL 4

19

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

48
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

53

31%

LEVEL 2

68

40%

LEVEL 3

36

21%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

43

29%

LEVEL 2

55

37%

LEVEL 3

34

23%

LEVEL 4

18

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

91
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

100

32%

LEVEL 2

123

39%

LEVEL 3

64

20%

LEVEL 4

27

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

95
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

77

29%

LEVEL 2

91

35%

LEVEL 3

60

23%

LEVEL 4

35

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

96
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

84

28%

LEVEL 2

121

40%

LEVEL 3

68

23%

LEVEL 4

28

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

98
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

64

25%

LEVEL 2

92

36%

LEVEL 3

61

24%

LEVEL 4

37

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

25

86%

LEVEL 2

3

10%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

20

74%

LEVEL 2

6

22%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

50

27%

LEVEL 2

74

40%

LEVEL 3

41

22%

LEVEL 4

19

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

40

25%

LEVEL 2

54

33%

LEVEL 3

45

28%

LEVEL 4

24

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

59

40%

LEVEL 2

50

34%

LEVEL 3

28

19%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

44

37%

LEVEL 2

44

37%

LEVEL 3

17

14%

LEVEL 4

13

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.