PORTVILLE CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 441

LEVEL 1

124

28%

LEVEL 2

194

44%

LEVEL 3

99

22%

LEVEL 4

24

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

140
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 423

LEVEL 1

107

25%

LEVEL 2

176

42%

LEVEL 3

108

26%

LEVEL 4

32

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

77
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

58

26%

LEVEL 2

92

41%

LEVEL 3

64

28%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

89
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

42

19%

LEVEL 2

87

40%

LEVEL 3

66

30%

LEVEL 4

23

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

46
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

66

31%

LEVEL 2

102

48%

LEVEL 3

35

16%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

51
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

65

32%

LEVEL 2

89

43%

LEVEL 3

42

20%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

120
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 423

LEVEL 1

118

28%

LEVEL 2

185

44%

LEVEL 3

97

23%

LEVEL 4

23

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

136
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 407

LEVEL 1

100

25%

LEVEL 2

171

42%

LEVEL 3

106

26%

LEVEL 4

30

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

122
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

94

24%

LEVEL 2

176

45%

LEVEL 3

98

25%

LEVEL 4

24

6%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

138
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

74

20%

LEVEL 2

163

43%

LEVEL 3

106

28%

LEVEL 4

32

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

30

61%

LEVEL 2

18

37%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

33

69%

LEVEL 2

13

27%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

85
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

71

24%

LEVEL 2

140

47%

LEVEL 3

66

22%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

95
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

60

24%

LEVEL 2

99

39%

LEVEL 3

72

28%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

53

37%

LEVEL 2

54

37%

LEVEL 3

33

23%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

47

28%

LEVEL 2

77

46%

LEVEL 3

36

21%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.