ESSEX COUNTY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

450
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,546

LEVEL 1

493

32%

LEVEL 2

603

39%

LEVEL 3

333

22%

LEVEL 4

117

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

424
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,275

LEVEL 1

330

26%

LEVEL 2

521

41%

LEVEL 3

294

23%

LEVEL 4

130

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

211
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 766

LEVEL 1

245

32%

LEVEL 2

310

40%

LEVEL 3

150

20%

LEVEL 4

61

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

209
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 621

LEVEL 1

147

24%

LEVEL 2

265

43%

LEVEL 3

141

23%

LEVEL 4

68

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

239
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 780

LEVEL 1

248

32%

LEVEL 2

293

38%

LEVEL 3

183

23%

LEVEL 4

56

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

215
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 654

LEVEL 1

183

28%

LEVEL 2

256

39%

LEVEL 3

153

23%

LEVEL 4

62

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

9

35%

LEVEL 2

10

38%

LEVEL 3

7

27%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

6

33%

LEVEL 2

6

33%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

3

17%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

9

50%

LEVEL 3

4

22%

LEVEL 4

4

22%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

46%

LEVEL 3

7

54%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

432
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,478

LEVEL 1

472

32%

LEVEL 2

574

39%

LEVEL 3

319

22%

LEVEL 4

113

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

409
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,232

LEVEL 1

320

26%

LEVEL 2

503

41%

LEVEL 3

282

23%

LEVEL 4

127

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

5

45%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

424
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,269

LEVEL 1

290

23%

LEVEL 2

555

44%

LEVEL 3

308

24%

LEVEL 4

116

9%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

407
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,091

LEVEL 1

209

19%

LEVEL 2

475

44%

LEVEL 3

279

26%

LEVEL 4

128

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

26
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

203

73%

LEVEL 2

48

17%

LEVEL 3

25

9%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

17
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

121

66%

LEVEL 2

46

25%

LEVEL 3

15

8%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

277
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 778

LEVEL 1

211

27%

LEVEL 2

290

37%

LEVEL 3

187

24%

LEVEL 4

90

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

256
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 618

LEVEL 1

113

18%

LEVEL 2

249

40%

LEVEL 3

169

27%

LEVEL 4

87

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

173
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 768

LEVEL 1

282

37%

LEVEL 2

313

41%

LEVEL 3

146

19%

LEVEL 4

27

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

168
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 657

LEVEL 1

217

33%

LEVEL 2

272

41%

LEVEL 3

125

19%

LEVEL 4

43

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.