LEWIS COUNTY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

609
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,853

LEVEL 1

516

28%

LEVEL 2

728

39%

LEVEL 3

445

24%

LEVEL 4

164

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

644
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,667

LEVEL 1

402

24%

LEVEL 2

621

37%

LEVEL 3

432

26%

LEVEL 4

212

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

307
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 917

LEVEL 1

242

26%

LEVEL 2

368

40%

LEVEL 3

229

25%

LEVEL 4

78

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

312
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 811

LEVEL 1

183

23%

LEVEL 2

316

39%

LEVEL 3

207

26%

LEVEL 4

105

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

302
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 936

LEVEL 1

274

29%

LEVEL 2

360

38%

LEVEL 3

216

23%

LEVEL 4

86

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

332
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 856

LEVEL 1

219

26%

LEVEL 2

305

36%

LEVEL 3

225

26%

LEVEL 4

107

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

5

42%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

9

60%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

592
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,767

LEVEL 1

484

27%

LEVEL 2

691

39%

LEVEL 3

431

24%

LEVEL 4

161

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

624
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,596

LEVEL 1

382

24%

LEVEL 2

590

37%

LEVEL 3

416

26%

LEVEL 4

208

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

11

32%

LEVEL 2

13

38%

LEVEL 3

8

24%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

7

27%

LEVEL 2

12

46%

LEVEL 3

6

23%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

10

50%

LEVEL 2

8

40%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

3

16%

LEVEL 2

10

53%

LEVEL 3

5

26%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

589
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,569

LEVEL 1

308

20%

LEVEL 2

672

43%

LEVEL 3

429

27%

LEVEL 4

160

10%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

621
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,389

LEVEL 1

224

16%

LEVEL 2

544

39%

LEVEL 3

415

30%

LEVEL 4

206

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

20
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

208

73%

LEVEL 2

56

20%

LEVEL 3

16

6%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

23
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

178

64%

LEVEL 2

77

28%

LEVEL 3

17

6%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

381
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 913

LEVEL 1

184

20%

LEVEL 2

348

38%

LEVEL 3

264

29%

LEVEL 4

117

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

361
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 758

LEVEL 1

121

16%

LEVEL 2

276

36%

LEVEL 3

232

31%

LEVEL 4

129

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

228
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 940

LEVEL 1

332

35%

LEVEL 2

380

40%

LEVEL 3

181

19%

LEVEL 4

47

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

283
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 909

LEVEL 1

281

31%

LEVEL 2

345

38%

LEVEL 3

200

22%

LEVEL 4

83

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.