SCHUYLER COUNTY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

193
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 791

LEVEL 1

272

34%

LEVEL 2

326

41%

LEVEL 3

143

18%

LEVEL 4

50

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

196
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 651

LEVEL 1

215

33%

LEVEL 2

240

37%

LEVEL 3

144

22%

LEVEL 4

52

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

95
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 393

LEVEL 1

134

34%

LEVEL 2

164

42%

LEVEL 3

70

18%

LEVEL 4

25

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

89
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

94

30%

LEVEL 2

128

41%

LEVEL 3

71

23%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

98
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

138

35%

LEVEL 2

162

41%

LEVEL 3

73

18%

LEVEL 4

25

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

107
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

121

36%

LEVEL 2

112

33%

LEVEL 3

73

21%

LEVEL 4

34

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

8

67%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

2

15%

LEVEL 2

8

62%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

179
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 739

LEVEL 1

256

35%

LEVEL 2

304

41%

LEVEL 3

136

18%

LEVEL 4

43

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

177
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 598

LEVEL 1

197

33%

LEVEL 2

224

37%

LEVEL 3

131

22%

LEVEL 4

46

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

6

38%

LEVEL 2

7

44%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

6

50%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

7

50%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

189
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 663

LEVEL 1

172

26%

LEVEL 2

302

46%

LEVEL 3

139

21%

LEVEL 4

50

8%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

192
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 551

LEVEL 1

136

25%

LEVEL 2

223

40%

LEVEL 3

140

25%

LEVEL 4

52

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

100

78%

LEVEL 2

24

19%

LEVEL 3

4

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

79

79%

LEVEL 2

17

17%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

192
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 644

LEVEL 1

212

33%

LEVEL 2

240

37%

LEVEL 3

142

22%

LEVEL 4

50

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

123
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

98

25%

LEVEL 2

166

43%

LEVEL 3

90

23%

LEVEL 4

33

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

126
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

67

21%

LEVEL 2

127

40%

LEVEL 3

91

28%

LEVEL 4

35

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

70
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 404

LEVEL 1

174

43%

LEVEL 2

160

40%

LEVEL 3

53

13%

LEVEL 4

17

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

70
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

148

45%

LEVEL 2

113

34%

LEVEL 3

53

16%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.