SUFFOLK COUNTY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

32,446
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 85,145

LEVEL 1

23,086

27%

LEVEL 2

29,613

35%

LEVEL 3

21,493

25%

LEVEL 4

10,953

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

18,799
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 46,493

LEVEL 1

12,949

28%

LEVEL 2

14,745

32%

LEVEL 3

11,741

25%

LEVEL 4

7,058

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

15,316
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 40,558

LEVEL 1

10,501

26%

LEVEL 2

14,741

36%

LEVEL 3

10,498

26%

LEVEL 4

4,818

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

8,741
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 21,717

LEVEL 1

5,805

27%

LEVEL 2

7,171

33%

LEVEL 3

5,607

26%

LEVEL 4

3,134

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

17,130
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 44,587

LEVEL 1

12,585

28%

LEVEL 2

14,872

33%

LEVEL 3

10,995

25%

LEVEL 4

6,135

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

10,058
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 24,776

LEVEL 1

7,144

29%

LEVEL 2

7,574

31%

LEVEL 3

6,134

25%

LEVEL 4

3,924

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

471
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,140

LEVEL 1

309

27%

LEVEL 2

360

32%

LEVEL 3

298

26%

LEVEL 4

173

15%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

388
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 836

LEVEL 1

181

22%

LEVEL 2

267

32%

LEVEL 3

215

26%

LEVEL 4

173

21%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

49
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

86

42%

LEVEL 2

71

34%

LEVEL 3

35

17%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

32
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

24

30%

LEVEL 2

24

30%

LEVEL 3

22

28%

LEVEL 4

10

13%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2,447
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,991

LEVEL 1

444

11%

LEVEL 2

1,100

28%

LEVEL 3

1,284

32%

LEVEL 4

1,163

29%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2,127
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,321

LEVEL 1

370

11%

LEVEL 2

824

25%

LEVEL 3

1,058

32%

LEVEL 4

1,069

32%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

23,277
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 48,853

LEVEL 1

8,222

17%

LEVEL 2

17,354

36%

LEVEL 3

15,168

31%

LEVEL 4

8,109

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

11,723
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 21,520

LEVEL 1

3,005

14%

LEVEL 2

6,792

32%

LEVEL 3

7,126

33%

LEVEL 4

4,597

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1,437
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 8,051

LEVEL 1

3,931

49%

LEVEL 2

2,683

33%

LEVEL 3

1,099

14%

LEVEL 4

338

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1,041
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,087

LEVEL 1

2,393

47%

LEVEL 2

1,653

32%

LEVEL 3

786

15%

LEVEL 4

255

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4,765
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 22,904

LEVEL 1

10,094

44%

LEVEL 2

8,045

35%

LEVEL 3

3,609

16%

LEVEL 4

1,156

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3,488
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 15,649

LEVEL 1

6,976

45%

LEVEL 2

5,185

33%

LEVEL 3

2,534

16%

LEVEL 4

954

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

31,421
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 73,326

LEVEL 1

15,230

21%

LEVEL 2

26,675

36%

LEVEL 3

20,690

28%

LEVEL 4

10,731

15%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

18,221
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 40,852

LEVEL 1

9,168

22%

LEVEL 2

13,463

33%

LEVEL 3

11,309

28%

LEVEL 4

6,912

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1,025
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11,819

LEVEL 1

7,856

66%

LEVEL 2

2,938

25%

LEVEL 3

803

7%

LEVEL 4

222

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

578
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,641

LEVEL 1

3,781

67%

LEVEL 2

1,282

23%

LEVEL 3

432

8%

LEVEL 4

146

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

32,113
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 78,491

LEVEL 1

18,201

23%

LEVEL 2

28,177

36%

LEVEL 3

21,221

27%

LEVEL 4

10,892

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

18,521
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 41,366

LEVEL 1

9,128

22%

LEVEL 2

13,717

33%

LEVEL 3

11,517

28%

LEVEL 4

7,004

17%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

333
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,654

LEVEL 1

4,885

73%

LEVEL 2

1,436

22%

LEVEL 3

272

4%

LEVEL 4

61

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

278
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,127

LEVEL 1

3,821

75%

LEVEL 2

1,028

20%

LEVEL 3

224

4%

LEVEL 4

54

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26,181
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 54,004

LEVEL 1

9,081

17%

LEVEL 2

18,742

35%

LEVEL 3

16,722

31%

LEVEL 4

9,459

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14,274
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 26,090

LEVEL 1

3,784

15%

LEVEL 2

8,032

31%

LEVEL 3

8,456

32%

LEVEL 4

5,818

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6,265
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 31,141

LEVEL 1

14,005

45%

LEVEL 2

10,871

35%

LEVEL 3

4,771

15%

LEVEL 4

1,494

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4,525
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 20,403

LEVEL 1

9,165

45%

LEVEL 2

6,713

33%

LEVEL 3

3,285

16%

LEVEL 4

1,240

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

32,440
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 85,090

LEVEL 1

23,054

27%

LEVEL 2

29,596

35%

LEVEL 3

21,488

25%

LEVEL 4

10,952

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

18,795
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 46,446

LEVEL 1

12,921

28%

LEVEL 2

14,730

32%

LEVEL 3

11,737

25%

LEVEL 4

7,058

15%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

6
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

32

58%

LEVEL 2

17

31%

LEVEL 3

5

9%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

4
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

28

60%

LEVEL 2

15

32%

LEVEL 3

4

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.