Skip to Content
Main content

BYRON-BERGEN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

153
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

33

13%

LEVEL 2

75

29%

LEVEL 3

77

30%

LEVEL 4

76

29%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

120
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

31

15%

LEVEL 2

51

25%

LEVEL 3

70

35%

LEVEL 4

50

25%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

74
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

19

14%

LEVEL 2

46

33%

LEVEL 3

37

27%

LEVEL 4

37

27%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

58
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

20

19%

LEVEL 2

29

27%

LEVEL 3

35

33%

LEVEL 4

23

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

79
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

14

11%

LEVEL 2

29

24%

LEVEL 3

40

33%

LEVEL 4

39

32%

MALE

PROFICIENT

62
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

11

12%

LEVEL 2

22

23%

LEVEL 3

35

37%

LEVEL 4

27

28%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

138
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

29

13%

LEVEL 2

65

28%

LEVEL 3

69

30%

LEVEL 4

69

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

113
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

28

15%

LEVEL 2

44

24%

LEVEL 3

66

36%

LEVEL 4

47

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

150
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

20

8%

LEVEL 2

68

29%

LEVEL 3

75

32%

LEVEL 4

75

32%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

118
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

18

10%

LEVEL 2

46

25%

LEVEL 3

69

38%

LEVEL 4

49

27%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

13

57%

LEVEL 2

7

30%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

13

65%

LEVEL 2

5

25%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

116
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

12

8%

LEVEL 2

32

20%

LEVEL 3

50

31%

LEVEL 4

66

41%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

85
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

31

26%

LEVEL 3

44

36%

LEVEL 4

41

34%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

21

21%

LEVEL 2

43

43%

LEVEL 3

27

27%

LEVEL 4

10

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

26

32%

LEVEL 2

20

25%

LEVEL 3

26

32%

LEVEL 4

9

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.