Skip to Content
Main content

SCHOOL 5 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

91
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

156

41%

LEVEL 2

137

36%

LEVEL 3

67

17%

LEVEL 4

24

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

91
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

147

40%

LEVEL 2

131

36%

LEVEL 3

62

17%

LEVEL 4

29

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

38
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

75

42%

LEVEL 2

65

37%

LEVEL 3

28

16%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

35
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

71

42%

LEVEL 2

65

38%

LEVEL 3

23

13%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

53
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

81

39%

LEVEL 2

72

35%

LEVEL 3

39

19%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

76

38%

LEVEL 2

66

33%

LEVEL 3

39

20%

LEVEL 4

17

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

8

38%

LEVEL 3

7

33%

LEVEL 4

5

24%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

26
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

26

30%

LEVEL 2

35

40%

LEVEL 3

17

20%

LEVEL 4

9

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

29
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

25

29%

LEVEL 2

31

36%

LEVEL 3

19

22%

LEVEL 4

10

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

28

49%

LEVEL 2

20

35%

LEVEL 3

8

14%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

28

51%

LEVEL 2

18

33%

LEVEL 3

7

13%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

44
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

100

47%

LEVEL 2

70

33%

LEVEL 3

34

16%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

38
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

91

45%

LEVEL 2

73

36%

LEVEL 3

26

13%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

87

28%

LEVEL 2

131

43%

LEVEL 3

66

21%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

87
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

89

30%

LEVEL 2

125

42%

LEVEL 3

59

20%

LEVEL 4

28

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

69

91%

LEVEL 2

6

8%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

58

85%

LEVEL 2

6

9%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

88
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 349

LEVEL 1

133

38%

LEVEL 2

128

37%

LEVEL 3

65

19%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

88
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

129

38%

LEVEL 2

120

36%

LEVEL 3

60

18%

LEVEL 4

28

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

23

66%

LEVEL 2

9

26%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

18

56%

LEVEL 2

11

34%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

36

33%

LEVEL 2

36

33%

LEVEL 3

22

20%

LEVEL 4

15

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

21

28%

LEVEL 2

25

34%

LEVEL 3

17

23%

LEVEL 4

11

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

120

44%

LEVEL 2

101

37%

LEVEL 3

45

16%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

126

43%

LEVEL 2

106

36%

LEVEL 3

45

15%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.