OAKSIDE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

65
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

77

34%

LEVEL 2

86

38%

LEVEL 3

49

21%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

61
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

101

44%

LEVEL 2

65

29%

LEVEL 3

48

21%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

35
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

36

31%

LEVEL 2

47

40%

LEVEL 3

23

19%

LEVEL 4

12

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

30
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

48

47%

LEVEL 2

24

24%

LEVEL 3

24

24%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

30
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

41

37%

LEVEL 2

39

35%

LEVEL 3

26

24%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

31
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

53

42%

LEVEL 2

41

33%

LEVEL 3

24

19%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

11
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

6

27%

LEVEL 2

5

23%

LEVEL 3

7

32%

LEVEL 4

4

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

7
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

2

14%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

5

36%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

17

39%

LEVEL 2

16

36%

LEVEL 3

10

23%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

26

57%

LEVEL 2

7

15%

LEVEL 3

12

26%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

38
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

53

35%

LEVEL 2

61

40%

LEVEL 3

30

20%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

40
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

67

42%

LEVEL 2

52

33%

LEVEL 3

34

21%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

61
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

51

27%

LEVEL 2

79

41%

LEVEL 3

45

24%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

60
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

70

37%

LEVEL 2

58

31%

LEVEL 3

47

25%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

26

70%

LEVEL 2

7

19%

LEVEL 3

4

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

31

79%

LEVEL 2

7

18%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

55
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

51

30%

LEVEL 2

63

37%

LEVEL 3

39

23%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

52
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

57

39%

LEVEL 2

39

26%

LEVEL 3

40

27%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

10
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

26

44%

LEVEL 2

23

39%

LEVEL 3

10

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

9
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

44

56%

LEVEL 2

26

33%

LEVEL 3

8

10%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

4

15%

LEVEL 2

11

42%

LEVEL 3

8

31%

LEVEL 4

3

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

41

42%

LEVEL 2

27

28%

LEVEL 3

20

21%

LEVEL 4

9

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

73

36%

LEVEL 2

75

37%

LEVEL 3

41

20%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

60

46%

LEVEL 2

38

29%

LEVEL 3

28

22%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.