Skip to Content
Main content

BYRAM HILLS CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

752
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,041

LEVEL 1

75

7%

LEVEL 2

214

21%

LEVEL 3

343

33%

LEVEL 4

409

39%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

710
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 969

LEVEL 1

72

7%

LEVEL 2

187

19%

LEVEL 3

320

33%

LEVEL 4

390

40%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

353
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 507

LEVEL 1

28

6%

LEVEL 2

126

25%

LEVEL 3

164

32%

LEVEL 4

189

37%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

333
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 474

LEVEL 1

32

7%

LEVEL 2

109

23%

LEVEL 3

167

35%

LEVEL 4

166

35%

MALE

PROFICIENT

399
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 534

LEVEL 1

47

9%

LEVEL 2

88

16%

LEVEL 3

179

34%

LEVEL 4

220

41%

MALE

PROFICIENT

377
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 495

LEVEL 1

40

8%

LEVEL 2

78

16%

LEVEL 3

153

31%

LEVEL 4

224

45%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

3

30%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

52
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

4

7%

LEVEL 3

14

25%

LEVEL 4

38

67%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

50
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

3

5%

LEVEL 2

4

7%

LEVEL 3

16

28%

LEVEL 4

34

60%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

673
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 940

LEVEL 1

69

7%

LEVEL 2

198

21%

LEVEL 3

312

33%

LEVEL 4

361

38%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

624
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 858

LEVEL 1

63

7%

LEVEL 2

171

20%

LEVEL 3

288

34%

LEVEL 4

336

39%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

4

12%

LEVEL 2

8

24%

LEVEL 3

14

41%

LEVEL 4

8

24%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

28
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

5

13%

LEVEL 2

5

13%

LEVEL 3

11

29%

LEVEL 4

17

45%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

720
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 899

LEVEL 1

15

2%

LEVEL 2

164

18%

LEVEL 3

321

36%

LEVEL 4

399

44%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

678
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 837

LEVEL 1

14

2%

LEVEL 2

145

17%

LEVEL 3

294

35%

LEVEL 4

384

46%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

32
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

60

42%

LEVEL 2

50

35%

LEVEL 3

22

15%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

32
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

58

44%

LEVEL 2

42

32%

LEVEL 3

26

20%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

741
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,020

LEVEL 1

71

7%

LEVEL 2

208

20%

LEVEL 3

335

33%

LEVEL 4

406

40%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

699
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 949

LEVEL 1

72

8%

LEVEL 2

178

19%

LEVEL 3

314

33%

LEVEL 4

385

41%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

4

19%

LEVEL 2

6

29%

LEVEL 3

8

38%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

9

45%

LEVEL 3

6

30%

LEVEL 4

5

25%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.