Skip to Content
Main content

LOUIS M KLEIN MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

228
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 521

LEVEL 1

101

19%

LEVEL 2

192

37%

LEVEL 3

147

28%

LEVEL 4

81

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

258
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 401

LEVEL 1

43

11%

LEVEL 2

100

25%

LEVEL 3

129

32%

LEVEL 4

129

32%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

99
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

54

21%

LEVEL 2

108

41%

LEVEL 3

65

25%

LEVEL 4

34

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

120
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

17

9%

LEVEL 2

50

27%

LEVEL 3

56

30%

LEVEL 4

64

34%

MALE

PROFICIENT

129
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

47

18%

LEVEL 2

84

32%

LEVEL 3

82

32%

LEVEL 4

47

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

138
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

26

12%

LEVEL 2

50

23%

LEVEL 3

73

34%

LEVEL 4

65

30%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

47
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

4

7%

LEVEL 2

6

11%

LEVEL 3

17

30%

LEVEL 4

30

53%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

40
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

7

14%

LEVEL 3

15

31%

LEVEL 4

25

51%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

162
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

49

14%

LEVEL 2

137

39%

LEVEL 3

113

32%

LEVEL 4

49

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

176
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

18

7%

LEVEL 2

65

25%

LEVEL 3

86

33%

LEVEL 4

90

35%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

44

42%

LEVEL 2

45

42%

LEVEL 3

15

14%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

35
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

20

25%

LEVEL 2

25

31%

LEVEL 3

25

31%

LEVEL 4

10

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

226
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 467

LEVEL 1

65

14%

LEVEL 2

176

38%

LEVEL 3

145

31%

LEVEL 4

81

17%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

254
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

24

7%

LEVEL 2

91

25%

LEVEL 3

127

34%

LEVEL 4

127

34%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

36

67%

LEVEL 2

16

30%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

19

59%

LEVEL 2

9

28%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

205
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 477

LEVEL 1

83

17%

LEVEL 2

189

40%

LEVEL 3

138

29%

LEVEL 4

67

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

242
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

36

10%

LEVEL 2

93

25%

LEVEL 3

124

33%

LEVEL 4

118

32%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

23
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

18

41%

LEVEL 2

3

7%

LEVEL 3

9

20%

LEVEL 4

14

32%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

16
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

7

23%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

11

37%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

207
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 422

LEVEL 1

63

15%

LEVEL 2

152

36%

LEVEL 3

135

32%

LEVEL 4

72

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

232
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

20

6%

LEVEL 2

77

23%

LEVEL 3

109

33%

LEVEL 4

123

37%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

38

38%

LEVEL 2

40

40%

LEVEL 3

12

12%

LEVEL 4

9

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

23

32%

LEVEL 2

23

32%

LEVEL 3

20

28%

LEVEL 4

6

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.