EDGEMONT UFSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

639
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 899

LEVEL 1

68

8%

LEVEL 2

192

21%

LEVEL 3

323

36%

LEVEL 4

316

35%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

631
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 834

LEVEL 1

54

6%

LEVEL 2

149

18%

LEVEL 3

286

34%

LEVEL 4

345

41%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

296
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 443

LEVEL 1

37

8%

LEVEL 2

110

25%

LEVEL 3

152

34%

LEVEL 4

144

33%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

295
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

33

8%

LEVEL 2

86

21%

LEVEL 3

133

32%

LEVEL 4

162

39%

MALE

PROFICIENT

343
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 456

LEVEL 1

31

7%

LEVEL 2

82

18%

LEVEL 3

171

38%

LEVEL 4

172

38%

MALE

PROFICIENT

336
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 420

LEVEL 1

21

5%

LEVEL 2

63

15%

LEVEL 3

153

36%

LEVEL 4

183

44%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

31
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

9

21%

LEVEL 3

15

36%

LEVEL 4

16

38%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

37
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

8

17%

LEVEL 3

13

28%

LEVEL 4

24

52%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

233
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

33

12%

LEVEL 3

96

35%

LEVEL 4

137

50%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

247
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

24

9%

LEVEL 3

89

32%

LEVEL 4

158

57%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

341
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 520

LEVEL 1

48

9%

LEVEL 2

131

25%

LEVEL 3

188

36%

LEVEL 4

153

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

320
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 458

LEVEL 1

37

8%

LEVEL 2

101

22%

LEVEL 3

166

36%

LEVEL 4

154

34%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

28
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

7

14%

LEVEL 2

16

31%

LEVEL 3

20

39%

LEVEL 4

8

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

25
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

8

17%

LEVEL 2

13

28%

LEVEL 3

17

37%

LEVEL 4

8

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

616
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 803

LEVEL 1

23

3%

LEVEL 2

164

20%

LEVEL 3

307

38%

LEVEL 4

309

38%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

612
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 759

LEVEL 1

25

3%

LEVEL 2

122

16%

LEVEL 3

273

36%

LEVEL 4

339

45%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

23
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

45

47%

LEVEL 2

28

29%

LEVEL 3

16

17%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

19
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

29

39%

LEVEL 2

27

36%

LEVEL 3

13

17%

LEVEL 4

6

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

635
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 890

LEVEL 1

66

7%

LEVEL 2

189

21%

LEVEL 3

322

36%

LEVEL 4

313

35%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

624
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 823

LEVEL 1

52

6%

LEVEL 2

147

18%

LEVEL 3

284

35%

LEVEL 4

340

41%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

3

33%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

7
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

5

45%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.