HUDSON FALLS CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

243
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 996

LEVEL 1

335

34%

LEVEL 2

418

42%

LEVEL 3

171

17%

LEVEL 4

72

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

224
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 739

LEVEL 1

268

36%

LEVEL 2

247

33%

LEVEL 3

155

21%

LEVEL 4

69

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

108
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 493

LEVEL 1

174

35%

LEVEL 2

211

43%

LEVEL 3

85

17%

LEVEL 4

23

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

101
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

122

35%

LEVEL 2

128

36%

LEVEL 3

75

21%

LEVEL 4

26

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

135
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 503

LEVEL 1

161

32%

LEVEL 2

207

41%

LEVEL 3

86

17%

LEVEL 4

49

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

123
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

146

38%

LEVEL 2

119

31%

LEVEL 3

80

21%

LEVEL 4

43

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

10

38%

LEVEL 2

8

31%

LEVEL 3

6

23%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

11

41%

LEVEL 2

9

33%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

4

15%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

224
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 928

LEVEL 1

311

34%

LEVEL 2

393

42%

LEVEL 3

158

17%

LEVEL 4

66

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

209
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 669

LEVEL 1

238

36%

LEVEL 2

222

33%

LEVEL 3

148

22%

LEVEL 4

61

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

7

64%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

7

33%

LEVEL 2

7

33%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

4

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

11

41%

LEVEL 2

10

37%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

3

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

240
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 830

LEVEL 1

212

26%

LEVEL 2

378

46%

LEVEL 3

168

20%

LEVEL 4

72

9%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

218
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 619

LEVEL 1

182

29%

LEVEL 2

219

35%

LEVEL 3

149

24%

LEVEL 4

69

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

123

74%

LEVEL 2

40

24%

LEVEL 3

3

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

86

72%

LEVEL 2

28

23%

LEVEL 3

6

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

157
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 473

LEVEL 1

119

25%

LEVEL 2

197

42%

LEVEL 3

103

22%

LEVEL 4

54

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

125
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

82

27%

LEVEL 2

94

31%

LEVEL 3

77

26%

LEVEL 4

48

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

86
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 523

LEVEL 1

216

41%

LEVEL 2

221

42%

LEVEL 3

68

13%

LEVEL 4

18

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

99
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 438

LEVEL 1

186

42%

LEVEL 2

153

35%

LEVEL 3

78

18%

LEVEL 4

21

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.