GLENS FALLS CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

284
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 823

LEVEL 1

221

27%

LEVEL 2

318

39%

LEVEL 3

203

25%

LEVEL 4

81

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

286
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 741

LEVEL 1

190

26%

LEVEL 2

265

36%

LEVEL 3

197

27%

LEVEL 4

89

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

143
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 393

LEVEL 1

90

23%

LEVEL 2

160

41%

LEVEL 3

111

28%

LEVEL 4

32

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

138
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

83

24%

LEVEL 2

125

36%

LEVEL 3

100

29%

LEVEL 4

38

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

141
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 430

LEVEL 1

131

30%

LEVEL 2

158

37%

LEVEL 3

92

21%

LEVEL 4

49

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

148
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

107

27%

LEVEL 2

140

35%

LEVEL 3

97

25%

LEVEL 4

51

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

8

36%

LEVEL 2

8

36%

LEVEL 3

4

18%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

13

48%

LEVEL 2

10

37%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

261
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 724

LEVEL 1

184

25%

LEVEL 2

279

39%

LEVEL 3

186

26%

LEVEL 4

75

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

265
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 662

LEVEL 1

163

25%

LEVEL 2

234

35%

LEVEL 3

185

28%

LEVEL 4

80

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

14

50%

LEVEL 2

11

39%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

7

44%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

11

35%

LEVEL 2

11

35%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

5

25%

LEVEL 2

10

50%

LEVEL 3

3

15%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

275
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 665

LEVEL 1

101

15%

LEVEL 2

289

43%

LEVEL 3

196

29%

LEVEL 4

79

12%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

278
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 620

LEVEL 1

96

15%

LEVEL 2

246

40%

LEVEL 3

191

31%

LEVEL 4

87

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

120

76%

LEVEL 2

29

18%

LEVEL 3

7

4%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

94

78%

LEVEL 2

19

16%

LEVEL 3

6

5%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

210
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 452

LEVEL 1

79

17%

LEVEL 2

163

36%

LEVEL 3

146

32%

LEVEL 4

64

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

205
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 413

LEVEL 1

63

15%

LEVEL 2

145

35%

LEVEL 3

138

33%

LEVEL 4

67

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

74
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

142

38%

LEVEL 2

155

42%

LEVEL 3

57

15%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

81
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

127

39%

LEVEL 2

120

37%

LEVEL 3

59

18%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.