Skip to Content
Main content

KENNETH L RUTHERFORD SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

43
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

114

48%

LEVEL 2

81

34%

LEVEL 3

36

15%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

33
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

119

56%

LEVEL 2

60

28%

LEVEL 3

30

14%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

21
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

53

47%

LEVEL 2

39

35%

LEVEL 3

17

15%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

16
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

61

56%

LEVEL 2

31

29%

LEVEL 3

15

14%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

22
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

61

49%

LEVEL 2

42

34%

LEVEL 3

19

15%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

17
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

58

56%

LEVEL 2

29

28%

LEVEL 3

15

14%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

31
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

38

33%

LEVEL 2

45

39%

LEVEL 3

25

22%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

18
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

33

41%

LEVEL 2

29

36%

LEVEL 3

16

20%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

42

72%

LEVEL 2

13

22%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

35

56%

LEVEL 2

21

33%

LEVEL 3

7

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

39

60%

LEVEL 2

17

26%

LEVEL 3

8

12%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

41
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

85

43%

LEVEL 2

73

37%

LEVEL 3

34

17%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

31
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

84

49%

LEVEL 2

56

33%

LEVEL 3

28

16%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

29

74%

LEVEL 2

8

21%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

35

85%

LEVEL 2

4

10%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

43
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

107

48%

LEVEL 2

75

33%

LEVEL 3

36

16%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

32
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

110

55%

LEVEL 2

57

29%

LEVEL 3

29

15%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

7

54%

LEVEL 2

6

46%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

9

69%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

14

29%

LEVEL 2

14

29%

LEVEL 3

16

33%

LEVEL 4

5

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

24

49%

LEVEL 2

15

31%

LEVEL 3

9

18%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

100

53%

LEVEL 2

67

35%

LEVEL 3

20

11%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

95

58%

LEVEL 2

45

28%

LEVEL 3

21

13%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.